FRUIT OF THE LOOM BRAND SHOP
Fruit of the Loom, Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 85463358 |
| Registration Number | 4146754 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
| Attorney Docket Number | FOL-US-14385 |
| Law Office Assigned | M50 |
| Employee Name | OH, WON TEAK |
Timeline
| 2011-10-26 | Date of First Use |
| 2011-11-03 | Application Filed |
| 2012-03-06 | Published for Opposition |
| 2012-05-22 | Trademark Registered |
| 2017-10-05 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 114 |
| 2017-10-05 | Status: Live/Registered |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Fruit of the Loom, Inc. |
| Address | Legal Department 1 Fruit of the Loom Drive Bowling Green NY 42103 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | NY |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 35 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,101,102 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| D10000 | "BRAND SHOP" |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2011-11-07 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2011-11-07 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2012-01-17 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2012-01-18 | 4 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2012-02-01 | 5 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2012-02-02 | 6 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | 2012-02-15 | 7 NONP E:E-Mail |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2012-03-06 | 8 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | 2012-03-06 | 9 NPUB E:E-Mail |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2012-05-22 | 10 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2012-08-06 | 11 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | 2017-05-22 | 12 REM1 E:E-Mail |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2017-09-05 | 13 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | 2017-09-05 | 14 E815 I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | 2017-10-05 | 15 APRE A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | 2017-10-05 | 16 C15A O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | 2017-10-05 | 17 NA85 E:E-Mail |
| NOTICE OF SUIT | 2017-11-28 | 18 NOSU I:Incoming Correspondence |
| COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | 2021-05-22 | 19 REM2 E:E-Mail |
| TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | 2022-03-17 | 20 E89R I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | 2022-09-09 | 21 APRE A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | 2022-09-09 | 22 89AG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | 2022-09-09 | 23 RNL1 Q: |
| NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | 2022-09-09 | 24 NA89 E:E-Mail |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 