GLEBAR COMPANY
Glebar Company, Inc
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 85390310 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
| Attorney Name | Stephen Cannavale |
| Attorney Docket Number | Gle003 |
| Law Office Assigned | M60 |
| Employee Name | HSU, FONG |
Timeline
| 1958-04-01 | Date of First Use |
| 2011-08-05 | Application Filed |
| 2013-07-31 | Abandon |
| 2013-09-03 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
| 2013-09-03 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Glebar Company, Inc |
| Address | 527 Commerce Street Franklin Lakes NJ 07417 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | NJ |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 7 |
| U.S. Codes: | 013,019,021,023,031,034,035 |
| International Codes: | 40 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,103,106 |
| International Codes: | 42 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,101 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| D10000 | "COMPANY" |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2011-08-09 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2011-08-09 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2011-09-30 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | 2011-10-04 | 4 RFTP Z:Deletion |
| EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | 2011-10-04 | 5 CPEA R:Renewal |
| EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | 2011-10-04 | 6 GEAP F:First Action |
| NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | 2011-10-04 | 7 GEAN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2011-10-04 | 8 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | 2011-10-05 | 9 CEPE I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | 2012-05-01 | 10 PROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | 2012-05-01 | 11 PETG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2012-05-01 | 12 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | 2012-05-01 | 13 NREV E:E-Mail |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2012-05-17 | 14 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2012-05-17 | 15 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2012-06-07 | 16 CNFR R:Renewal |
| FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2012-06-07 | 17 GNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | 2012-06-07 | 18 GNFN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2013-01-30 | 19 CFRC R:Renewal |
| SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | 2013-01-30 | 20 GNSF O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | 2013-01-30 | 21 GNS1 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2013-09-03 | 22 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2013-09-03 | 23 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 