To: | JC Marketing, Inc. (jbrunton1@aol.com) |
Subject: | U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 85378860 - OK - 011-46 |
Sent: | 10/10/2011 3:17:55 PM |
Sent As: | ECOM111@USPTO.GOV |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 Attachment - 3 Attachment - 4 Attachment - 5 Attachment - 6 Attachment - 7 Attachment - 8 Attachment - 9 Attachment - 10 Attachment - 11 Attachment - 12 Attachment - 13 |
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION
APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 85378860
MARK: OK
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: |
CLICK HERE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp
|
APPLICANT: JC Marketing, Inc.
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: |
|
TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW.
ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 10/10/2011
The assigned examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application and determines as follows:
SECTION 2(d) REFUSAL – LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION
In this case, the following factors are the most relevant: similarity of the marks, similarity of the goods and/or services, and similarity of trade channels of the goods and/or services. See In re Dakin’s Miniatures Inc., 59 USPQ2d 1593 (TTAB 1999); TMEP §§1207.01 et seq.
Comparison of Marks
Here, the proposed mark is “Ok” with a design. The registrant’s mark is “Mr. A-Ok Grip”. The marks share the wording “Ok”. The applicant appears to have deleted the wording “Mr.”, “A”, and “Grip”. The mere deletion of wording from a registered mark may not be sufficient to overcome a likelihood of confusion. See In re Mighty Leaf Tea, 601 F.3d 1342, 94 USPQ2d 1257 (Fed. Cir. 2010); In re Optica Int’l, 196 USPQ 775, 778 (TTAB 1977); TMEP §1207.01(b)(ii)-(iii). Applicant’s mark does not create a distinct commercial impression because it contains the same common wording as registrant’s mark, and there is no other wording to distinguish it from registrant’s mark.
Further, the addition of the design may be included within the “ok” in the registrant’s mark as well, which will further cause consumer confusion.
Comparison of Goods/Services
In the instant case, the proposed goods/services are as follows:
Here, the proposed mark is as follows:
Class 006: metal garden spades
Class 021: Household and kitchen utensils made of plastic, metal and bamboo, namely plastic and metal dustpans, metal and bamboo cooking and eating utensils, bamboo brooms and non-electric bamboo rice steamers, and earthenware and ceramic kitchenware and pots
The registrant’s relevant goods/services are as follows:
Class 020: non-metal handles for rakes, mops, brooms, and other garden, household and landscaping tools.
Please see the attached websites that demonstrate that garden tools and household tools and replacement handles are sold to consumers under the same product name. [Captured October 10, 2011]
If applicant elects to respond to the refusal above, applicant must also respond to the issue(s) as follows.
Identification of Goods/Services
Applicant’s description of goods/services is unacceptable because it is indefinite. §1402.1.
Class 006: metal garden spades
Class 021: Household and kitchen utensils made of plastic, metal and bamboo, namely plastic and metal dustpans, metal and bamboo cooking and eating utensils, bamboo brooms and non-electric bamboo rice steamers, and earthenware and ceramic kitchenware and pots
Applicant must clarify the identification of goods/services as follows: See TMEP §1402.01.
(1) specify the common commercial names for cooking and eating utensils and kitchenware
(2) the applicant has provided a contradictory modifier, such as plastic, metal, and bamboo, whereas some of the goods do not include all compositions.
Suggested Acceptable Identification Of Goods/Services
Applicant may adopt the following identification of goods/services, if accurate: See TMEP §1402.01.
Class 006: metal garden spades
Class 021: Household and kitchen utensils made of plastic, metal and bamboo, namely plastic and metal dustpans, metal and bamboo cooking
and eating utensils, namely {specify the common commercial names} bamboo brooms and non-electric bamboo rice steamers, and earthenware and ceramic kitchenware namely {specify the common commercial names} and pots
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and/or services in trademark applications, please see the online searchable Manual of Acceptable Identifications of Goods and Services at http://tess2.gov.uspto.report/netahtml/tidm.html.
Please note that, while the identification of goods may be amended to clarify or limit the goods, adding to the goods or broadening the scope of the goods is not permitted. 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06. Therefore, applicant may not amend the identification to include goods that are not within the scope of the goods set forth in the present identification.
If applicant has questions about its application or needs assistance in responding to this Office action, please telephone the assigned trademark examining attorney directly at the number below.
/Nakia D. Henry/
Trademark Attorney (Law Office 111)
United States Patent and Trademark Office
Phone: (571) 272-7208
E-mail: Nakia.henry
TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: Go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp. Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using TEAS, to allow for necessary system updates of the application. For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov. For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney. E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to this Office action by e-mail.
All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.
WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE: It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants). If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response.
PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION: To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) at http://tarr.gov.uspto.report/. Please keep a copy of the complete TARR screen. If TARR shows no change for more than six months, call 1-800-786-9199. For more information on checking status, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/.
TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS: Use the TEAS form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageE.htm.