GREAT PRICE, GOOD PRICE, ABOVE MARKET
Truecar, Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 85266088 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 3000: Illustration: Drawing or design which also includes word(s)/ letter(s)/number(s) |
| Attorney Name | Nathan E. Ferguson |
| Attorney Docket Number | 32166-TM1018 |
| Law Office Assigned | L70 |
| Employee Name | STEIN, JAMES W |
Timeline
| 2009-09-00 | Date of First Use |
| 2011-03-14 | Application Filed |
| 2012-07-12 | Abandon |
| 2012-08-08 | Location: TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
| 2012-08-08 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Truecar, Inc. |
| Address | 120 Broadway, Suite 200 Santa Monica DE 90401 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | DE |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Design Search Codes
| 200308 | Blueprints; Charts; Diagrams; Graph paper; Paper, graph; Periodic chart of the elements and similar graphics |
| 261101 | Rectangles as carriers or rectangles as single or multiple line borders |
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 35 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,101,102 |
| International Codes: | 42 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,101 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| CC0000 | The color(s) black, white, purple, orange, green, red, dark blue, blue, dark gray and gray is/are claimed as a feature of the mark. |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2011-03-17 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2011-03-18 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | 2011-03-19 | 3 MDSC O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2011-06-13 | 4 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2011-06-14 | 5 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2011-06-14 | 6 GNRT F:First Action |
| NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2011-06-14 | 7 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | 2011-06-21 | 8 COAR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | 2011-06-21 | 9 CHAN I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2011-12-14 | 10 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2011-12-14 | 11 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2011-12-15 | 12 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2012-01-11 | 13 CNFR R:Renewal |
| FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2012-01-11 | 14 GNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | 2012-01-11 | 15 GNFN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2012-08-08 | 16 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2012-08-08 | 17 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | 2015-04-03 | 18 COAR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | 2015-04-03 | 19 CHAN I:Incoming Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 