STRAWBERRY WINDOWS
Boler, Lewyn
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 85258900 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
| Attorney Name | Clyde Vanel, Esq. |
| Law Office Assigned | L90 |
| Employee Name | KING, CHRISTINA B |
Timeline
| 2011-03-05 | Application Filed |
| 2012-10-23 | Published for Opposition |
| 2012-12-18 | Location: INTENT TO USE SECTION |
| 2013-07-22 | Abandon |
| 2013-07-22 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-09-18 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Boler, Lewyn |
| Address | 1000 East Channel Street Stockton CA US 95205 |
| Legal Entity Type | Individual |
| Legal Entity State | US |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 3 |
| U.S. Codes: | 001,004,006,050,051,052 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| D10000 | "WINDOWS" |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2011-03-10 | 1 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2011-06-06 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | 2011-06-10 | 3 CPEA R:Renewal |
| EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | 2011-06-10 | 4 GEAP F:First Action |
| NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | 2011-06-10 | 5 GEAN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2012-01-06 | 6 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2012-01-06 | 7 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2012-02-02 | 8 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | 2012-02-02 | 9 PETR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | 2012-02-08 | 10 APET A:Allowance for Publication |
| PETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | 2012-02-09 | 11 PGOA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2012-02-08 | 12 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2012-02-08 | 13 GNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2012-02-08 | 14 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2012-09-05 | 15 CNSA P: |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2012-09-13 | 16 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2012-09-16 | 17 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | 2012-10-03 | 18 NONP E:E-Mail |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2012-10-23 | 19 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | 2012-10-23 | 20 NPUB E:E-Mail |
| NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2012-12-18 | 21 NOAM E:E-Mail |
| ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2013-07-22 | 22 ABN6 S: |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2013-07-22 | 23 MAB6 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2018-09-18 | 24 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2018-09-18 | 25 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 