SNOTROCKER
Kim Allen
Application Filed: 2011-03-01
Trademark Application Details
ABANDONED PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 85254451 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
| Law Office Assigned | M70 |
| Employee Name | SHANAHAN, WILLIAM PATR |
Timeline
| 2011-03-01 | Application Filed |
| 2011-07-19 | Published for Opposition |
| 2012-10-07 | Date of First Use |
| 2015-01-05 | Abandon |
| 2015-02-20 | Location: PETITIONS OFFICE |
| 2015-02-20 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Kim Allen |
| Address | 4026 sw 333rd st. Federal Way WA US 98023 |
| Legal Entity Type | Individual |
| Legal Entity State | US |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 25 |
| U.S. Codes: | 022,039 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0251 | Caps; Hats; Short-sleeved or long-sleeved t-shirts; T-shirts |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2011-03-04 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2011-03-04 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2011-06-01 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2011-06-01 | 4 CNSA P: |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2011-07-19 | 5 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | 2011-07-19 | 6 NPUB E:E-Mail |
| NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2011-09-13 | 7 NOAM E:E-Mail |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2012-02-28 | 8 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2012-02-28 | 9 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | 2012-03-20 | 10 AITU A:Allowance for Publication |
| EXTENSION 1 FILED | 2012-02-28 | 11 EXT1 S: |
| EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | 2012-03-20 | 12 EX1G S: |
| NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | 2012-03-21 | 13 EXRA E:E-Mail |
| TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | 2012-09-20 | 14 PROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | 2012-09-20 | 15 PETG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | 2012-09-20 | 16 TPEX I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | 2012-09-20 | 17 NREV E:E-Mail |
| EXTENSION 2 FILED | 2012-09-13 | 18 EXT2 S: |
| EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | 2012-09-24 | 19 EX2G S: |
| NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | 2012-09-25 | 20 EXRA E:E-Mail |
| TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2013-02-17 | 21 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXTENSION 3 FILED | 2013-02-17 | 22 EXT3 S: |
| EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | 2013-02-17 | 23 EX3G S: |
| NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | 2013-02-19 | 24 EXRA E:E-Mail |
| TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | 2013-08-19 | 25 EISU I:Incoming Correspondence |
| USE AMENDMENT FILED | 2013-08-19 | 26 IUAF S: |
| STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2013-08-27 | 27 SUPC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | 2013-09-24 | 28 CNRT W: |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2013-09-24 | 29 GNRT F:First Action |
| NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2013-09-24 | 30 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2014-01-03 | 31 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2014-01-03 | 32 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2014-01-04 | 33 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | 2014-01-23 | 34 CNFR W: |
| FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2014-01-23 | 35 GNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | 2014-01-23 | 36 GNFN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | 2014-05-27 | 37 ERFR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2014-05-27 | 38 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2014-05-28 | 39 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | 2014-07-01 | 40 CNCF W: |
| CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2014-07-01 | 41 GNCF O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | 2014-07-01 | 42 GNS1 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | 2014-11-12 | 43 ERFR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2014-11-12 | 44 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | 2014-11-13 | 45 UNPR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2015-02-02 | 46 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2015-02-02 | 47 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | 2015-02-04 | 48 PROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2015-02-04 | 49 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | 2015-02-12 | 50 APET A:Allowance for Publication |
| PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | 2015-02-20 | 51 PETD O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 