NOTE TO THE FILE

---

SERIAL NUMBER:            85220689

DATE:                                04/19/2011

NAME:                               ieulin

NOTE:         

Searched:                                                             Discussed ID with: 

     Google                                 Senior Atty
     Lexis/Nexis                            Managing Atty
     OneLook
     Wikipedia
     Acronym Finder                         Protest evidence reviewed
     Other:

Checked:                                                              Discussed Geo. Sig. with:
     Geographic significance                Senior Atty
     Surname                                Managing Atty 
     Translation
     ID with ID/CLASS mailbox

Discussed file with
Attorney/Applicant via:
        phone                               Left message with
        email                               Attorney/Applicant

     Requested Law Library search           Issued Examiner’s Amendment
     for:                                   and entered changes in TRADEUPS

        PRINT        DO NOT PRINT         Added design code in TRADEUPS
     Description of the mark
     Translation statement                  Re-imaged standard character
                                            drawing
     Negative translation statement             
     Consent of living individual           Contacted TM MADRID ID/CLASS
                                            about misclassified definite ID
     Changed TRADEUPS to:

 X   OTHER:

 

 

 

---

From: stephen chesnoff [mailto:schesnoff@nyc.rr.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2011 10:56 AM
To: Eulin, Ingrid
Subject: Serial No. 77797940 PLMA MATCHMAKER Trademark Office Action

Dear Ms Eulin, In response to your Office Action for the above referenced trademark application, the Applicant would like to delete Classes 35 and 42 from its application in light of your position that the trademark specimens it submitted were not adequate and move forward with just Classes 09 and 41 which you found acceptable.  Should the Applicant amend it application by deleting these classes or file a response to the Office Action by deleting these classes.  If acceptable you could issue an Examiner's Amendment that Applicant wishes to delete Classes 35 and 42 from its

PLMA MATCHMAKER application.  I would appreciate your assistance. Thank you.

Stephen Chesnoff

Attorney for Applicant

212 588 1554

         Sent to TICRS as Serial Number: 77797940
         Sent to TICRS as Serial Number: 77797940