KL STUDIO

Mangiamele Inc

Application Filed: 2010-11-19

Trademark Application Details

Status

602

Dead/Abandoned

ABANDONED-FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE

Research	OneLook Acronym Finder
Serial Number	85180631
Mark Drawing Code	4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form
Law Office Assigned	M60
Employee Name	GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE

Timeline

2010-11-19	Application Filed
2014-08-05	Abandon
2014-09-02	Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
2014-09-02	Status: Dead/Abandoned
2018-07-08	Transaction Date

Trademark Applicants & Owners

Owner:	MANGIAMELE INC
Address	PO BOX 29837 LOS ANGELES CA 90029
Legal Entity Type	Corporation
Legal Entity State	CA

Documents

Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.

Attorney of Record

MANGIAMELE INC
PO BOX 29837
LOS ANGELES CA 90029

Good, Services, and Codes

International Codes:	14
U.S. Codes:	002,027,028,050

Type Code	Type
D10000	"STUDIO"

Trademark Filing History

Description	Date	Event Coding
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM	2010-11-23	1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence
NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM	2010-11-23	2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence
NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED	2010-11-24	3 MPMK O:Outgoing Correspondence
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	2011-03-01	4 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	2011-03-02	5 CNRT R:Renewal
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	2011-03-02	6 GNRT F:First Action
NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	2011-03-02	7 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence
TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	2011-04-11	8 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence
ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	2011-04-11	9 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	2011-05-27	10 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	2011-05-27	11 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	2011-05-28	12 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence
SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN	2011-06-10	13 CNSL R:Renewal
LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED	2011-06-10	14 GNSL S:
NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED	2011-06-10	15 GNS3 O:Outgoing Correspondence
ASSIGNED TO LIE	2011-12-12	16 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	2011-12-12	17 RCSC S:
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	2012-06-12	18 RCSC S:
AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP	2012-11-21	19 ASGN I:Incoming Correspondence
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	2012-12-17	20 RCSC S:
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	2013-06-17	21 RCSC S:
LIE CHECKED SUSP - TO ATTY FOR ACTION	2014-01-13	22 RCCK S:
FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	2014-02-03	23 CNFR R:Renewal
FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	2014-02-03	24 GNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence
NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	2014-02-03	25 GNFN O:Outgoing Correspondence
TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED	2014-05-31	26 WOAR I:Incoming Correspondence
WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED	2014-05-31	27 WOAG I:Incoming Correspondence
ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	2014-09-02	28 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	2014-09-02	29 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.