SIMPLE
Best Response Strategies, LLC
Application Filed: 2010-09-20
Trademark Application Details
SECTION 8 & 15-ACCEPTED AND ACKNOWLEDGED
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 85133442 |
| Registration Number | 4109715 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
| Attorney Name | Amy G. Pruett |
| Attorney Docket Number | 059261.0002 |
| Law Office Assigned | M80 |
| Employee Name | BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN |
Timeline
| 2010-09-20 | Application Filed |
| 2011-02-14 | Date of First Use |
| 2011-06-28 | Published for Opposition |
| 2012-03-06 | Trademark Registered |
| 2018-03-16 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 117 |
| 2018-03-16 | Status: Live/Registered |
| 2019-06-25 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Best Response Strategies, LLC |
| Address | 201 West 7th Street Richmond VA 23224 |
| Legal Entity Type | Limited Liability Company |
| Legal Entity State | VA |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 9 |
| U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
| International Codes: | 42 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,101 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0091 | Software, namely, computer software for managing and tracking interactions with customers and potential customers, customer relationship management software, Internet portal software in the nature of computer software that provides web-based access to applications and services through a web operating system or portal interface, sales-tracking software, marketing-tracking software, marketing analysis software, reporting software for reporting customer contact efficiency, customer contact-tracking software, call-tracking software, and database management software; interactive marketing software enabling users, merchants, manufacturers and retailers to share the location and detailed information of products and services through the use of wireless communications |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2010-09-23 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2010-09-23 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2010-12-28 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2011-01-02 | 4 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2011-01-02 | 5 GNRT F:First Action |
| NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2011-01-02 | 6 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | 2011-05-11 | 7 CNEA R:Renewal |
| EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | 2011-05-11 | 8 GNEA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | 2011-05-11 | 9 GNEN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | 2011-05-11 | 10 XAEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2011-05-11 | 11 CNSA P: |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2011-05-25 | 12 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2011-05-26 | 13 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2011-06-28 | 14 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | 2011-06-28 | 15 NPUB E:E-Mail |
| NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2011-08-23 | 16 NOAM E:E-Mail |
| TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | 2011-12-19 | 17 EISU I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | 2012-01-19 | 18 AITU A:Allowance for Publication |
| USE AMENDMENT FILED | 2011-12-19 | 19 IUAF S: |
| STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2012-01-19 | 20 SUPC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | 2012-01-20 | 21 CNPR P: |
| LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2012-01-27 | 22 REGV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | 2012-01-28 | 23 SUNA E:E-Mail |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2012-03-06 | 24 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | 2017-03-06 | 25 REM1 E:E-Mail |
| TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | 2018-03-06 | 26 E815 I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | 2018-03-16 | 27 APRE A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | 2018-03-16 | 28 C15A O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | 2018-03-16 | 29 NA85 E:E-Mail |
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2019-06-24 | 30 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2019-06-24 | 31 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | 2021-03-06 | 32 REM2 E:E-Mail |
| TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | 2022-03-07 | 33 E89R I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | 2022-08-25 | 34 APRE A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | 2022-08-30 | 35 89AG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | 2022-08-30 | 36 RNL1 Q: |
| NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | 2022-08-30 | 37 NA89 E:E-Mail |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 