Research |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Serial Number | 85060419 |
Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
Attorney Name | Kevin Oliveira |
Attorney Docket Number | 21240.14321 |
Law Office Assigned | M60 |
Employee Name | ROACH, APRIL K |
2010-06-11 | Application Filed |
2012-03-12 | Abandon |
2012-03-12 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2012-03-15 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | ![]() |
Address | 6354 Walker Lane Alexandria VA 223103252 |
Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
Legal Entity State | VA |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
International Codes: | 9 |
U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0091 | software for calculation of energy, water, carbon and chemical consumption, use and waste in the field of energy, water, carbon, chemical and waste conservation and management; software for monitoring sequestration of chemicals and compounds in the field of energy, water, carbon, chemical and waste conservation and management; software for calculation and analysis of Executive Order 13514 requirements, namely for creating, tracking and managing plant and facility sustainability and environmental management systems goals and for comprehensive master planning for energy and water |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2010-06-15 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2010-06-16 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2010-09-21 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2010-09-28 | 4 CNRT R:Renewal |
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2010-09-28 | 5 CNRT F:First Action |
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2011-03-16 | 6 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2011-03-16 | 7 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2011-03-16 | 8 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2011-04-07 | 9 CNFR R:Renewal |
FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 2011-04-07 | 10 CNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | 2011-10-06 | 11 EXAF T:TTAB Proceeding |
JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | 2011-10-06 | 12 JURT T:TTAB Proceeding |
EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | 2011-10-06 | 13 EXPI T:TTAB Proceeding |
TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | 2011-10-06 | 14 ERFR I:Incoming Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2011-10-17 | 15 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | 2011-10-21 | 16 CNCF S: |
ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | 2011-10-24 | 17 RECD O:Outgoing Correspondence |
EXPARTE APPEAL DSMSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | 2012-01-25 | 18 EXFB T:TTAB Proceeding |
EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | 2012-03-12 | 19 EXPT T:TTAB Proceeding |
ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | 2012-03-12 | 20 ABN3 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | 2012-03-16 | 21 MAB3 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2012-09-28 | 22 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.