Research |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Serial Number | 85011491 |
Registration Number | 3922374 |
Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
Cancellation Code | 2 |
Domestic Representative | Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C. |
Attorney Name | David Ehrlich |
Attorney Docket Number | KALL 1003101 |
Law Office Assigned | L90 |
Employee Name | COLLIER, DAVID E |
2010-04-12 | Application Filed |
2010-12-07 | Published for Opposition |
2011-02-22 | Location: PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION |
2011-02-22 | Trademark Registered |
2017-09-29 | Cancelled |
2017-09-29 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | ![]() |
Address | Rheingaustrasse 190-196 65203 Wiesbaden DE |
Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
Legal Entity State | DE |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
International Codes: | 17 |
U.S. Codes: | 001,005,012,013,035,050 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0171 | plastic films for packaging foodstuffs; plastic films for the manufacture of sausage casings |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2010-04-15 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2010-04-15 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | 2010-04-16 | 3 MPMK O:Outgoing Correspondence |
TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | 2010-04-21 | 4 PARI I:Incoming Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2010-05-13 | 5 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
APPLICANT AMENDMENT PRIOR TO EXAMINATION - ENTERED | 2010-05-13 | 6 AMPX O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2010-07-19 | 7 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2010-07-21 | 8 CNSA P: |
LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2010-07-22 | 9 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2010-08-04 | 10 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2010-08-24 | 11 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | 2010-09-22 | 12 EPPA I:Incoming Correspondence |
PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | 2010-09-22 | 13 PETI T:TTAB Proceeding |
ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | 2010-09-24 | 14 APET A:Allowance for Publication |
FAX RECEIVED | 2010-10-15 | 15 FAXX I:Incoming Correspondence |
NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2010-10-19 | 16 NOAM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | 2010-10-22 | 17 CORV P: |
PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | 2010-10-22 | 18 PCBG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | 2010-10-22 | 19 ATRQ I:Incoming Correspondence |
NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | 2010-11-01 | 20 IUCN S: |
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2010-11-17 | 21 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2010-12-07 | 22 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2011-02-22 | 23 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2017-01-31 | 24 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | 2017-04-05 | 25 CORV 1: |
CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | 2017-09-29 | 26 C8.. O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.