LOTUS AP ADVANCED PERFORMANCE
Group Lotus Limited
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 79345799 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 5000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Stylized form |
Timeline
| 2022-04-04 | Application Filed |
| 2022-07-21 | Location: INITIAL REVIEW/SERIALIZATION BRANCH(MAILROOM) |
| 2022-07-21 | Status: Live/Pending |
| 2022-07-22 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Group Lotus Limited |
| Entity Statement | Limited Company |
| Address | Potash Lane, Hethel, Norwich, Norfolk NR14 8EZ GB |
| Legal Entity Type | |
| Legal Entity State | GB |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 12 |
| U.S. Codes: | 019,021,023,031,035,044 |
| International Codes: | 37 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,103,106 |
| International Codes: | 40 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,103,106 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0401 | Custom manufacture of vehicles; customisation of vehicles; custom built construction of vehicles |
| GS0401 | Custom manufacture of vehicles; customisation of vehicles; custom built construction of vehicles |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | 2022-07-21 | 1 REPR M: |
| NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2022-07-22 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | 2022-07-26 | 3 MAFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2022-08-14 | 4 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2022-08-19 | 5 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | 2022-08-20 | 6 RFCR E:E-Mail |
| REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | 2022-09-16 | 7 RFRR P: |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | 2022-09-16 | 8 RFCS P: |
| REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | 2022-10-11 | 9 RFNT P: |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2023-03-03 | 10 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2023-03-03 | 11 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2023-03-04 | 12 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | 2023-03-06 | 13 CNEA R:Renewal |
| EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | 2023-03-06 | 14 XAEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2023-03-06 | 15 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | 2023-03-06 | 16 CNEA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | 2023-03-22 | 17 NONP E:E-Mail |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2023-04-11 | 18 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | 2023-04-11 | 19 NPUB E:E-Mail |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2023-06-27 | 20 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| NOTICE OF REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | 2023-06-27 | 21 NRCC E:E-Mail |
| FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | 2023-09-27 | 22 FICR P: |
| FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | 2023-09-29 | 23 FIMP P: |
| FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | 2023-09-29 | 24 FICS P: |
| FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | 2023-10-24 | 25 FINO P: |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 