RINGJECT
Ophtec B.v.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 79264307 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
| Law Office Assigned | L90 |
| Employee Name | STIGLITZ, SUSAN R |
Timeline
| 2019-05-02 | Application Filed |
| 2019-08-12 | Location: TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
| 2019-09-01 | Status: Live/Pending |
| 2019-09-20 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  OPHTEC B.V. |
| Entity Statement | Besloten Vennootschap |
| Address | Schweitzerlaan 15 NL-9728 NR Groningen XP |
| Legal Entity Type | |
| Legal Entity State | XP |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 10 |
| U.S. Codes: | 026,039,044 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0101 | Surgical instruments, surgical instruments, visco-elastic solutions, ophthalmic surgical instruments for cataract surgery, refractive surgery and trauma surgery, pre-loaded capsular tension rings for use in single-use syringes, vacuum containment systems |
| GS0101 | Surgical instruments; ophthalmic surgical devices for cataract surgery, refractive surgery and trauma surgery, pre-loaded capsular tension rings for use in single-use injection syringes, for medical purposes |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | 2019-08-01 | 1 REPR M: |
| NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2019-08-08 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2019-08-09 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2019-08-12 | 4 CNRT R:Renewal |
| APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | 2019-08-13 | 5 MAFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | 2019-08-13 | 6 RFCR E:E-Mail |
| REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | 2019-09-01 | 7 RFRR P: |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | 2019-09-01 | 8 RFCS P: |
| REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | 2019-09-20 | 9 RFNT P: |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2020-02-28 | 10 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2020-03-03 | 11 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2020-03-05 | 12 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2020-03-05 | 13 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2020-03-06 | 14 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | 2020-03-25 | 15 NONP E:E-Mail |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2020-04-14 | 16 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | 2020-04-14 | 17 NPUB E:E-Mail |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2020-06-30 | 18 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | 2020-09-30 | 19 FICR P: |
| FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | 2020-10-28 | 20 FIMP P: |
| FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | 2020-10-28 | 21 FICS P: |
| FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | 2020-11-14 | 22 FINO P: |
| NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | 2023-12-30 | 23 NREP P: |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 