To: | HML Finans ApS (info@bridgeip.net) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 79246711 - NASH - 300.024092 |
Sent: | August 20, 2019 02:15:55 PM |
Sent As: | ecom100@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 79246711
Mark: NASH
|
|
Correspondence Address: Bridge Intellectual Property Services PL
|
|
Applicant: HML Finans ApS
|
|
Reference/Docket No. 300.024092
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: August 20, 2019
International Registration No. 0810285
Notice of Provisional Full Refusal
Deadline for responding. The USPTO must receive applicant’s response within six months of the “date on which the notification was sent to WIPO (mailing date)” located on the WIPO cover letter, or the U.S. application will be abandoned. To confirm the mailing date, go to the USPTO’s Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) database, select “US Serial, Registration, or Reference No.,” enter the U.S. application serial number in the blank text box, and click on “Documents.” The mailing date used to calculate the response deadline is the “Create/Mail Date” of the “IB-1rst Refusal Note.”
Respond to this Office action using the USPTO’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Discussion of provisional full refusal. This is a provisional full refusal of the request for extension of protection to the United States of the international registration, known in the United States as a U.S. application based on Trademark Act Section 66(a). See 15 U.S.C. §§1141f(a), 1141h(c).
This Office action is in response to applicant’s communication filed on June 26, 2019.
Trademark Act Section 2(d) Refusals - MAINTAINED
The Trademark Act Section 2(d) refusals based on U.S. Registration Nos. 9843936 (as to the applicant’s Class 9 goods) and 0530815 (as to the applicant’s Class 11 goods) are maintained.
The applicant and registrant’s marks are identical in appearance, sound, and meaning, “and have the potential to be used . . . in exactly the same manner.” In re i.am.symbolic, llc, 116 USPQ2d 1406, 1411 (TTAB 2015), aff’d, 866 F.3d 1315, 123 USPQ2d 1744 (Fed. Cir. 2017). Additionally, because they are identical, these marks are likely to engender the same connotation and overall commercial impression when considered in connection with applicant’s and registrant’s respective goods and/or services. Id. Therefore, the marks are confusingly similar.
Generally, the greater degree of similarity between the applied-for mark and the registered mark, the lesser the degree of similarity between the goods and/or services of the parties is required to support a finding of likelihood of confusion. In re C.H. Hanson Co., 116 USPQ2d 1351, 1353 (TTAB 2015) (citing In re Opus One Inc., 60 USPQ2d 1812, 1815 (TTAB 2001)); In re Thor Tech, Inc., 90 USPQ2d 1634, 1636 (TTAB 2009).
Determining likelihood of confusion is based on the description of the goods stated in the application and registration at issue, not on extrinsic evidence of actual use. See In re Detroit Athletic Co., 903 F.3d 1297, 1307, 128 USPQ2d 1047, 1052 (Fed. Cir. 2018) (citing In re i.am.symbolic, llc, 866 F.3d 1315, 1325, 123 USPQ2d 1744, 1749 (Fed. Cir. 2017)).
The overriding concern is not only to prevent buyer confusion as to the source of the goods and/or services, but to protect the registrant from adverse commercial impact due to use of a similar mark by a newcomer. See In re Shell Oil Co., 992 F.2d 1204, 1208, 26 USPQ2d 1687, 1690 (Fed. Cir. 1993). Therefore, any doubt regarding a likelihood of confusion determination is resolved in favor of the registrant. TMEP §1207.01(d)(i); see Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Packard Press, Inc., 281 F.3d 1261, 1265, 62 USPQ2d 1001, 1003 (Fed. Cir. 2002); In re Hyper Shoppes (Ohio), Inc., 837 F.2d 463, 464-65, 6 USPQ2d 1025, 1026 (Fed. Cir. 1988).
International Class 11 Identification of Goods - MAINTAINED
The requirement to amend the International Class 11 identification of goods is maintained.
The wording “heating apparatus, namely, electric heaters for household purposes” and “drying apparatus, namely, dehumidifiers for household” in the amended Class 11 identification of goods is indefinite and must be clarified to specify the type of electric heater and correct a grammatical omission. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01.
Applicant may substitute the following wording, if accurate: “Lighting apparatus, namely, lighting installations; heating apparatus, namely, electric radiant heaters for household purposes; steam generating installations; apparatus for cooking, namely, cooktops and microwave ovens; refrigerators; drying apparatus, namely, dehumidifiers for household purposes; ventilating apparatus, namely, fans for household, commercial and industrial use; water purification and filtration apparatus” in Class 11.
Applicant may amend the identification to clarify or limit the goods and/or services, but not to broaden or expand the goods and/or services beyond those in the original application or as acceptably amended. See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06. Generally, any deleted goods and/or services may not later be reinserted. See TMEP §1402.07(e). Additionally, for applications filed under Trademark Act Section 66(a), the scope of the identification for purposes of permissible amendments is limited by the international class assigned by the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization (International Bureau); and the classification of goods and/or services may not be changed from that assigned by the International Bureau. 37 C.F.R. §2.85(d); TMEP §§1401.03(d), 1904.02(b). Further, in a multiple-class Section 66(a) application, classes may not be added or goods and/or services transferred from one existing class to another. 37 C.F.R. §2.85(d); TMEP §1401.03(d).
NEW ISSUE – International Class 9 Identification of Goods
Based on the applicant’s response, the following new issue must be responded to: International Class 9 identification of goods.
The original Class 9 identification of goods was acceptable as written in the original application. The applicant in their response amended the Class 9 identification of goods to “apparatus for recording, transmission and reproduction of sound and/or images, loudspeakers, amplifiers and CD players excluding recorded audio disc, compact discs, DVD audio disc, DVD video discs and tapes all featuring music and sound effects”.
The identification must be clarified because the added exclusionary wording makes the wording unclear and indefinite. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01. For example, as worded, the applicant’s CD players exclude compact discs. A CD player that does not allow for inserting compact discs does not exist. In addition, as worded, the applicant’s loudspeakers and amplifiers also exclude recorded audio disc, compact discs, DVD audio disc, DVD video discs and tapes all featuring music and sound effects. As loudspeakers and amplifiers do not generally include these items, the wording is unclear, indefinite and unacceptable. Finally, “apparatus for recording, transmission and reproduction of sound and/or images” may include blank discs and tapes, but they do not generally include prerecorded discs and tapes such as the excluded items.
The applicant may amend their Class 9 identification of goods to clarify the goods or may amend the identification to the wording stated in the original application: “Apparatus for recording, transmission and reproduction of sound and/or images; loudspeakers, amplifiers and CD players”.
The proposed amendment to the identification of goods and/or services is not acceptable for the reasons stated in this Office action. Thus, the previous wording in the existing identification remains operative for purposes of future amendments and for determining the scope of future amendments. See TMEP §1402.07(d).
Applicant may amend the identification to clarify or limit the goods and/or services, but not to broaden or expand the goods and/or services beyond those in the original application or as acceptably amended. See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06. Generally, any deleted goods and/or services may not later be reinserted. See TMEP §1402.07(e). Additionally, for applications filed under Trademark Act Section 66(a), the scope of the identification for purposes of permissible amendments is limited by the international class assigned by the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization (International Bureau); and the classification of goods and/or services may not be changed from that assigned by the International Bureau. 37 C.F.R. §2.85(d); TMEP §§1401.03(d), 1904.02(b). Further, in a multiple-class Section 66(a) application, classes may not be added or goods and/or services transferred from one existing class to another. 37 C.F.R. §2.85(d); TMEP §1401.03(d).
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action
Applicant must be represented by a U.S.-licensed attorney at the USPTO to respond to or appeal the provisional refusal. The application record indicates that applicant’s domicile is outside of the United States in Denmark, but no attorney who is an active member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a U.S. State or territory has been appointed to represent the applicant in this matter. All applicants whose permanent legal residence or principal place of business is not within the United States or its territories must be represented by a U.S.-licensed attorney at the USPTO. 37 C.F.R. §§2.2(o), 2.11(a). Thus, applicant is required to be represented by a U.S.-licensed attorney and must appoint one. 37 C.F.R. §2.11(a). This application will not proceed to registration without such representation. See id. See Hiring a U.S.-licensed trademark attorney for more information.
To appoint or designate a U.S.-licensed attorney. To appoint an attorney, applicant should (1) submit a completed Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) Revocation, Appointment, and/or Change of Address of Attorney/Domestic Representative form and (2) promptly notify the trademark examining attorney that this TEAS form was submitted. Alternatively, if applicant has already retained an attorney, the attorney can respond to this Office action by using the appropriate TEAS response form and provide his or her attorney information in the form and sign it as applicant’s attorney. See 37 C.F.R. §2.17(b)(1)(ii).
Applicant must be represented by a U.S.-licensed attorney at the USPTO to respond to or appeal the provisional refusal. The application record indicates that applicant’s domicile is outside of the United States in Denmark, but no attorney who is an active member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a U.S. State or territory has been appointed to represent the applicant in this matter. All applicants whose permanent legal residence or principal place of business is not within the United States or its territories must be represented by a U.S.-licensed attorney at the USPTO. 37 C.F.R. §§2.2(o), 2.11(a). Thus, applicant is required to be represented by a U.S.-licensed attorney and must appoint one. 37 C.F.R. §2.11(a). This application will not proceed to registration without such representation. See id. See Hiring a U.S.-licensed trademark attorney for more information.
To appoint or designate a U.S.-licensed attorney. To appoint an attorney, applicant should (1) submit a completed Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) Revocation, Appointment, and/or Change of Address of Attorney/Domestic Representative form and (2) promptly notify the trademark examining attorney that this TEAS form was submitted. Alternatively, if applicant has already retained an attorney, the attorney can respond to this Office action by using the appropriate TEAS response form and provide his or her attorney information in the form and sign it as applicant’s attorney. See 37 C.F.R. §2.17(b)(1)(ii).
/Patricia A. Horrall/
Staff Attorney
Law Office 100
571-272-9651
Informal inquiries: patricia.horrall@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE