To: | Knauf Gips KG (docketing@wnlaw.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 79237600 - KNAUF - 16056.125 |
Sent: | December 09, 2019 12:15:42 PM |
Sent As: | ecom106@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 79237600
Mark: KNAUF
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: Knauf Gips KG
|
|
Reference/Docket No. 16056.125
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
EXAMINER’S AMENDMENT
Issue date: December 09, 2019
International Registration No. 1279513
REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION DENIED: PARTIAL ABANDONMENT – APPLICATION HAS BEEN AMENDED
The trademark examining attorney has carefully reviewed applicant’s request for reconsideration and is denying the request for the reasons stated below. See 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(3); TMEP §§715.03, 715.03(a)(ii)(D), 718.02(a). The requirement(s) made final in the Office action dated June 6, 2019 are maintained and continue to be final. See TMEP §715.03(a)(ii)(D). Furthermore, since applicant has not filed an appeal with the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, and there is no time remaining in the response period, the application is being held partially abandoned. See 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §2.65(a)-(a)(1); TMEP §§715.03(a)(ii)(D), (c), 718.02(a), 1714.01(a)(ii).
In the present case, applicant’s request has not resolved all the outstanding issue(s), nor does it raise a new issue or provide any new or compelling evidence with regard to the outstanding issue(s) in the final Office action. In addition, applicant’s analysis and arguments are not persuasive nor do they shed new light on the issues. Accordingly, the request is denied.
The 2(d) refusal is satisfied and withdrawn per the information the unity of control.
With respect to the identification of goods for Class 16, the wording “Paper, cardboard and goods made from these materials, namely, paper strips, namely, being reinforcement and cover strips for construction purposes” remains indefinite as to the nature of the goods and proper classification.
The final Office action included refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) that applied to only a portion of the application; therefore, only that portion of the application is abandoned. See 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §2.65(a)(1); TMEP §718.02(a).
The portion of the identification that was the subject of the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) will be deleted from the application. The application will proceed with the following identification for Class 16: “Paper, cardboard; printed matter, namely, books, magazines, manuals featuring building construction and drywall systems; paint brushes; printed instructional and teaching material in the field of building construction, and drywall systems, except apparatus”. The remaining goods and services are acceptable.
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and/or services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual at http://tess2.gov.uspto.report/netahtml/tidm.html. See TMEP §1402.04.
Applicant may respond by filing a petition to the Director to request a reversal of the decision to abandon the application in part. TMEP §§715.03(a)(ii)(D), 718.02(a), 1713.01; see 37 C.F.R. §2.146. However, the Director will reverse the decision only if there is clear error or an abuse of discretion. In re GTE Educ. Servs., 34 USPQ2d 1478, 1479-80 (Comm’r Pats. 1994); TMEP §§715.03(a)(ii)(D), 1713.01. A petition may be filed online via the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) with a $100 fee. See 37 C.F.R. §2.6(a)(15)(ii).
/Bernice Middleton/
Bernice Middleton
Examining Attorney
Law Office 106
571-270-1514
Bernice.Middleton@uspto.gov