Offc Action Outgoing

PROFEEL

Valio Ltd

Offc Action Outgoing

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)

OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION

 

U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO.  79224854

 

MARK: PROFEEL

 

 

        

*79224854*

CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

       CASTREN & SNELLMAN ATTORNEYS LTD.

       Eteläesplanadi 14

       FI-00131 Helsinki

       FINLAND

       

 

CLICK HERE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER:

http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp

 

 

 

APPLICANT: Valio Ltd

 

 

 

CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:  

       N/A

CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: 

      

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

 

INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION NO. 1384424

 

STRICT DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THIS NOTIFICATION:  TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF THE REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF PROTECTION OF THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE A COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS PROVISIONAL FULL REFUSAL NOTIFICATION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE “DATE ON WHICH THE NOTIFICATION WAS SENT TO WIPO (MAILING DATE)” LOCATED ON THE WIPO COVER LETTER ACCOMPANYING THIS NOTIFICATION.

 

In addition to the Mailing Date appearing on the WIPO cover letter, a holder (hereafter “applicant”) may confirm this Mailing Date using the USPTO’s Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/.  To do so, enter the U.S. application serial number for this application and then select “Documents.”  The Mailing Date used to calculate the response deadline for this provisional full refusal is the “Create/Mail Date” of the “IB-1rst Refusal Note.”

 

This is a PROVISIONAL FULL REFUSAL of the request for extension of protection of the mark in the above-referenced U.S. application.  See 15 U.S.C. §1141h(c).  See below in this notification (hereafter “Office action”) for details regarding the provisional full refusal.

 

The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney.  Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below.  15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.

 

SUMMARY OF ISSUES:

  • Identification of Goods
  • Entity and Country of Incorporation

 

 

Identification of Goods    TMEP §1402.01.

Applicant has submitted the following identification of goods for International Class 005:

Dietetic substances adapted for medical use, excluding trace elements for human and animal use, edible plant fibers (non-nutritive), fructooligosaccharides for veterinary purposes;  food for babies, dietary and nutritional supplements, excluding trace elements for human and animal use, edible plant fibers (non-nutritive), fructooligosaccharides for veterinary purposes, lactose, lactic acid bacteria, lactobacillus, protein dietary supplements 

Acceptable as submitted.

 

Applicant has submitted the following identification of goods for International Class 029:

Preserved, frozen, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, compotes; milk and milk products including yogurt, curd, creams, sour creams, whipped creams, milk drinks, milk-based beverages containing mainly milk, sour milks, milk puddings, milk shakes, soya milk (milk substitute), protein milk, flavored milk, drinks containing lactobacillus, kephir, koumiss; whey; cottage cheese, cheese, cheese products; milk powder, dried whey products and whey powders; edible oils and fats; butter, margarine; soups, milk and cream based dips; fruit juice for cooking

 

The wording “including” in the identification of goods is indefinite and must be deleted and replaced with a definite term, such as “namely,” “consisting of,” “particularly,” or “in particular.”  See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03(a).  The identification must be specific and all-inclusive.  This wording is an open-ended term (e.g., “including,” “such as”) that is not acceptable because it fails to identify specific goods.  See TMEP §1402.03(a). 

 

The wording “milk drinks” in the identification of goods is unacceptable as indefinite.  Further clarification is required.   For example, if accurate, the applicant may amend this wording to:

  • Milk drinks containing fruits,

 

The word “products” in International Class 029 must be clarified because it is too broad and could identify goods in more than one international class.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03. 

Applicant may amend the wording to the following, if accurate: 

  • Cheese products, namely, ________________ [specify i.e., cheese wheels]
  • Dried whey products, namely, __________________ [specify]

 

Applicant has submitted the following identification of goods for International Class 030:

Coffee, cocoa, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; ice creams; vinegar, sauces; spices; ice; cereal snacks, high-protein cereal bars; milk and cream based sauces 

 

The wording “cereal snacks” in the identification of goods is unacceptable as indefinite.  Further clarification is required.   For example, if accurate, the applicant may amend this wording to:

  • Cereal-based snack foods;

 

Applicant has submitted the following identification of goods for International Class 032:

Mineral and aerated waters, other non-alcoholic drinks; fruit drinks, fruit juices, syrups and other preparations for making beverages; protein-enriched sports beverages 

 

The wording "and other non-alcoholic drinks;" in the phrase "mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic drinks;" in the identification of goods is unacceptable as indefinite. Further clarification is required.

For example, if accurate, the applicant may amend this wording to:

  • mineral and aerated waters; other non-alcoholic drinks, namely, ______________ [specify i.e.,  energy shots]

 

The wording "syrups and other preparations for making beverages" in the identification of goods is unacceptable as indefinite.  Further clarification is required.   For example, if accurate, the applicant may amend this wording to:

  • syrups, concentrates or powders used in the preparations of _________________ [specify i.e., soft drinks, sports drinks, energy drinks]

 

In a Trademark Act Section 66(a) application, classification of goods and/or services may not be changed from that assigned by the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization.  37 C.F.R. §2.85(d); TMEP §§1401.03(d), 1904.02(b).  Additionally, classes may not be added or goods and/or services transferred from one class to another in a multiple-class Section 66(a) application.  37 C.F.R. §2.85(d); TMEP §1401.03(d). 

 

Applicant’s goods and/or services may be clarified or limited, but may not be expanded beyond those originally itemized in the application or as acceptably amended.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Applicant may clarify or limit the identification by inserting qualifying language or deleting items to result in a more specific identification; however, applicant may not substitute different goods and/or services or add goods and/or services not found or encompassed by those in the original application or as acceptably amended.  See TMEP §1402.06(a)-(b).  The scope of the goods and/or services sets the outer limit for any changes to the identification and is generally determined by the ordinary meaning of the wording in the identification.  TMEP §§1402.06(b), 1402.07(a)-(b).  Any acceptable changes to the goods and/or services will further limit scope, and once goods and/or services are deleted, they are not permitted to be reinserted.  TMEP §1402.07(e).

 

For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual.  See TMEP §1402.04.

 

 

Entity – Country of Incorporation

The application does not indicate applicant’s legal entity and citizenship, or state or country of organization or incorporation.  Accordingly, applicant must specify its legal entity and its national citizenship or foreign country of organization or incorporation.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(3)(i)-(ii), 2.61(b); TMEP §§803.03, 803.04.  This information is required for all U.S. trademark applications, including those filed under Trademark Act Section 66(a).  See 37 C.F.R. §7.25(a)-(b); TMEP §1904.02(a). 

 

Acceptable legal entities include an individual, a partnership, a corporation, a joint venture, or the foreign equivalent.  See TMEP §§803.03 et seq.  If applicant’s legal entity is an individual, applicant must so specify and provide his or her national citizenship.  TMEP §803.03(a).  If applicant is a corporation, association, partnership, joint venture, or the foreign equivalent, applicant must so specify and provide the foreign country under whose laws applicant is organized or incorporated.  TMEP §803.03(b)-(c).  For an association, applicant must also specify whether the association is incorporated or unincorporated, unless the foreign country and the designation or description “association/associazione” appear in Appendix D of the Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure (TMEP).  TMEP §803.03(c).

 

If applicant is organized under the laws of a foreign province or geographical region, applicant should specify both the foreign province or geographical region and the foreign country in which the province or region is located.  See TMEP §803.04.  To provide this information online via the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) Response to Office Action form, applicant must open the response form, answer “Yes” to wizard question number 5, find the “Owner Information” page, and do the following:  (1) locate the “Entity Type” heading on that page and select “Other;” (2) locate the “Specify Entity Type” heading and select “Other” under the Foreign Entity option, and enter in the free-text field below both applicant’s entity type and the foreign province or geographical region of its organization (e.g., partnership of Victoria); and (3) locate the “State or Country Where Legally Organized” heading and select the appropriate foreign country (e.g., Australia) under the Non-U.S. Entity option.

 

 

 

SEARCH   The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d).  TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).

 

 

 

WHO IS PERMITTED TO RESPOND TO THIS PROVISIONAL FULL REFUSAL:  Any response to this provisional refusal must be personally signed by an individual applicant, all joint applicants, or someone with legal authority to bind a juristic applicant (e.g., a corporate officer or general partner).  37 C.F.R. §§2.62(b), 2.193(e)(2)(ii); TMEP §712.01.  If applicant hires a qualified U.S. attorney to respond on his or her behalf, then the attorney must sign the response.  37 C.F.R. §§2.193(e)(2)(i), 11.18(a); TMEP §§611.03(b), 712.01.  Qualified U.S. attorneys include those in good standing with a bar of the highest court of any U.S. state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and other U.S. commonwealths or U.S. territories.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.17(a), 2.62(b), 11.1, 11.14(a); TMEP §§602, 712.01.  Additionally, for all responses, the proper signatory must personally sign the document or personally enter his or her electronic signature on the electronic filing.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.193(a); TMEP §§611.01(b), 611.02.  The name of the signatory must also be printed or typed immediately below or adjacent to the signature, or identified elsewhere in the filing.  37 C.F.R. §2.193(d); TMEP §611.01(b).

 

In general, foreign attorneys are not permitted to represent applicants before the USPTO (e.g., file written communications, authorize an amendment to an application, or submit legal arguments in response to a requirement or refusal).  See 37 C.F.R. §11.14(c), (e); TMEP §§602.03-.03(b), 608.01. 

 

DESIGNATION OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE:  The USPTO encourages applicants who do not reside in the United States to designate a domestic representative upon whom any notice or process may be served.  TMEP §610; see 15 U.S.C. §§1051(e), 1141h(d); 37 C.F.R. §2.24(a)(1)-(2).  Such designations may be filed online at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp. 

 

 

 

 

/Linda E. Blohm/

Trademark Examining Attorney

linda.blohm@uspto.gov

phone: 571.272.9129

fax: 571.273.9110

Law Office 110

 

TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER:  Go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp.  Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application.  For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov.  For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney.  E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to this Office action by e-mail.

 

All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.

 

WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE:  It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants).  If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response. 

 

PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION:  To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/.  Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen.  If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199.  For more information on checking status, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/.

 

TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS:  Use the TEAS form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed