Offc Action Outgoing

STRICT DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THIS NOTIFICATION: TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF THE REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF PROTECTION OF THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE A COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS PROVISIONAL FULL REFUSAL NOTIFICATION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE “DATE ON WHICH THE NOTIFICATION WAS SENT TO WIPO (MAILING DATE)” LOCATED ON THE WIPO COVER LETTER ACCOMPANYING THIS NOTIFICATION.

In addition to the Mailing Date appearing on the WIPO cover letter, a holder (hereafter “applicant”) may confirm this Mailing Date using the USPTO’s Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/. To do so, enter the U.S. application serial number for this application and then select “Documents.” The Mailing Date used to calculate the response deadline for this provisional full refusal is the “Create/Mail Date” of the “IB-1rst Refusal Note.”

This is a PROVISIONAL FULL REFUSAL of the request for extension of protection of the mark in the above-referenced U.S. application. See 15 U.S.C. §1141h(c). See below in this notification (hereafter “Office action”) for details regarding the provisional full refusal.

The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issues below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.

SUMMARY OF ISSUES:

Citizenship Omitted
Identification of Goods

ISSUE REGARDING APPLICANT’S ENTITY TYPE

Applicant must specify its country of incorporation. 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(3)(ii); TMEP §§803.03(c), 803.04. This information is required in all U.S. trademark applications. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(3)(ii); TMEP §§803.03, 803.04.

If applicant is organized under the laws of a foreign province or geographical region, applicant should specify both the foreign province or geographical region and the foreign country in which the province or region is located. See TMEP §803.04. To provide this information online via the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) response form, applicant must (1) locate the “Entity Type” heading and select “Other;” (2) locate the “Specify Entity Type” heading and select “Other” under the Foreign Entity option, and enter in the free-text field below both applicant’s entity type and the foreign province or geographical region of its organization (e.g., partnership of Victoria); and (3) locate the “State or Country Where Legally Organized” heading and select the appropriate foreign country (e.g., Australia) under the Non-U.S. Entity option. See id.

IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS

Particular wording in the identification in the application is indefinite and must be clarified because it does not appear to describe any goods in the identified international class. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1402.01, 1904.02(c)(iii). Generally, a trademark examining attorney will recommend language to replace unacceptable wording in identifications of goods. See TMEP §1402.01(e). However, in this case, the trademark examining attorney is unable to suggest alternative wording because the text that follows in International Class 30 is indefinite and does not appear to describe any goods in that class: “Chemical products for brining, pickling, marinating and smoking foodstuffs; industrial chemicals for use as additives in butchers' shops and in meat production plants, namely, bulking and binding products for meat and charcuterie products.” See TMEP §1904.02(c)(iii).

Applicant may respond by amending this wording to clarify the nature of the goods; however, any amendment to the identification must identify goods in International Class 30 and be within the scope of the wording in the initial application. See TMEP §§1402.01(c), 1402.07(a), 1904.02(c)(iii). The scope of the identification for purposes of permissible amendments is limited by the international class assigned by the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization (International Bureau). 37 C.F.R. §2.85(f); TMEP §§1402.07(a), 1904.02(c). If an applicant amends to goods that are in a class other than that assigned by the International Bureau, the amendment will not be accepted because it would exceed the scope and those goods would no longer have a basis for registration under U.S. law. TMEP §§1402.01(c), 1904.02(c).

Alternatively, applicant may delete this unacceptable wording from the identification. See TMEP §1904.02(c)(iii)-(iv). However, once an application has been expressly amended to delete goods, those items generally may not later be re-inserted. See TMEP §1402.07(e).

If applicant believes the classification assigned by the International Bureau was in error, applicant may contact the International Bureau and request correction of, or recordation of a limitation to, the international registration. TMEP §1904.02(c)(iii)-(iv), (e)(i)-(e)(ii). However, filing such a request with the International Bureau is not considered a formal response to this Office action. See TMEP §1904.02(c)(iv), (e)(iii). Applicant must also file a timely and complete response to this Office action, stating that applicant has filed a request for a correction or to record a limitation with the International Bureau that will resolve the outstanding issue. See 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §2.62(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03, 1904.02(c)(iii)-(iv), (e)(iii). The response should include (1) a copy of the request for correction or limitation filed with the International Bureau and (2) a request to suspend action on the application, which will normally be granted under such circumstances. See TMEP §§716.02(g), 1904.02(c)(iii)-(iv).

The wording “Products for keeping foodstuffs fresh and rendering them durable, including chemical products for preserving foodstuffs” in the identification of goods is indefinite and must be deleted and replaced with a definite term, such as “namely,” “consisting of,” “particularly,” or “in particular.” See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03(a). The identification must be specific and all-inclusive. This wording is an open-ended term (e.g., “including,” “such as”) that is not acceptable because it fails to identify specific goods. See TMEP §1402.03(a).

The wording “chemical additives for meat and charcuterie products” in the identification of goods is indefinite and must be clarified because applicant must more clearly indicate that the chemical additives are for use in the manufacture of meat and charcuterie products. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01.

The wording “products for preventing the coagulation of animal albumin” and “substances for influencing the color, consistency and consistency changes of meat and charcuterie products” in the identification of goods is indefinite and must be clarified because applicant must more clearly indicate that the substances and products are in the nature of chemical additives for use in the manufacture of food. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01.

The wording “chemical additives for comminuting” in the identification of goods is indefinite and must be clarified because applicant must more clearly indicate that the chemical additives are used in the manufacture of food, as well as specify what is being comminuted. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01.

The wording “Dietetic and restorative dietetic foodstuffs” in the identification of goods is indefinite and must be clarified because this identification in Class 5 requires the specification that the dietetic foodstuffs are adapted for medical purposes. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01.

Applicant may substitute the following wording, if accurate (examining attorney’s suggestions in bold font):

Class 1: Products for keeping foodstuffs fresh and rendering them durable, namely, chemical products for the fresh-keeping and preserving of food; industrial chemicals for use as additives in butchers' shops and in meat production plants, namely, chemical additives for use in the manufacture of food, in particular for use in the manufacture of meat and charcuterie products, for preventing the coagulation of animal albumin, for influencing the color and consistency of meat and charcuterie products, for changing the consistency of meat and charcuterie products, and for comminuting {specify what is being comminuted, e.g., meat and charcuterie products}

Class 5: Dietetic and restorative dietetic foodstuffs adapted for medical purposes

Applicant’s goods may be clarified or limited, but may not be expanded beyond those originally itemized in the application or as acceptably narrowed. See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §§1402.06, 1904.02(c)(iv). Applicant may clarify or limit the identification by inserting qualifying language or deleting items to result in a more specific identification; however, applicant may not substitute different goods or add goods not found or encompassed by those in the original application or as acceptably narrowed. See TMEP §1402.06(a)-(b). The scope of the goods sets the outer limit for any changes to the identification and is generally determined by the ordinary meaning of the wording in the identification. TMEP §§1402.06(b), 1402.07(a)-(b). Any acceptable changes to the goods will further limit scope, and once goods are deleted, they are not permitted to be reinserted. TMEP §1402.07(e). Additionally, for applications filed under Trademark Act Section 66(a), the scope of the identification for purposes of permissible amendments is limited by the international class assigned by the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization (International Bureau); and the classification of goods and/or services may not be changed from that assigned by the International Bureau. 37 C.F.R. §2.85(d); TMEP §§1401.03(d), 1904.02(b). Further, in a multiple-class Section 66(a) application, classes may not be added or goods transferred from one existing class to another. 37 C.F.R. §2.85(d); TMEP §1401.03(d).

For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual. See TMEP §1402.04.

RESPONSE GUIDELINES

For this application to proceed further, applicant must explicitly address each requirement raised in this Office action. If the action includes a refusal, applicant may provide arguments and/or evidence as to why the refusal should be withdrawn and the mark should register. Applicant may also have other options specified in this Office action for responding to a refusal, and should consider those options carefully. To respond to requirements and certain refusal response options, applicant should set forth in writing the required changes or statements. For more information and general tips on responding to USPTO Office actions, response options, and how to file a response online, see “Responding to Office Actions” on the USPTO’s website.

If applicant does not respond to this Office action within six months of the date on which the USPTO sends this Office action to the International Bureau, or responds by expressly abandoning the application, the application process will end and the trademark will fail to register. See 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.65(a), 2.68(a); TMEP §§711, 718.01, 718.02.

When an application has abandoned for failure to respond to an Office action, an applicant may timely file a petition to revive the application, which, if granted, would allow the application to return to active status. See 37 C.F.R. §2.66; TMEP §1714. The petition must be filed within two months of the date of issuance of the notice of abandonment and may be filed online via the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) with a $100 fee. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(15)(ii), 2.66(a)(1), (b)(1).

FOREIGN PRO SE APPLICANT – UNITED STATE-QUALIFIED COUNSEL SUGGESTED

Because of the legal technicalities and strict deadlines involved in the USPTO application process, applicant may wish to hire a qualified U.S. attorney specializing in trademark matters to represent applicant in this process and provide legal advice. Although the undersigned trademark examining attorney is permitted to help an applicant understand the contents of an Office action as well as the application process in general, no USPTO attorney or staff is permitted to give an applicant legal advice or statements about an applicant’s legal rights. TMEP §§705.02, 709.06. For attorney referral information, applicant may consult the American Bar Association’s Consumers’ Guide to Legal Help or an online directory of legal professionals, such as FindLaw®. The USPTO, however, may not assist an applicant in the selection of an attorney. 37 C.F.R. §2.11.

Please note that foreign attorneys, other than authorized Canadian attorneys, are not permitted to represent applicants before the USPTO (e.g., file written communications, authorize an amendment to an application, or submit legal arguments in response to a requirement or refusal). See 37 C.F.R. §§2.17(e), 11.14(c), (e); TMEP §602.03-.03(c).

ASSISTANCE

If applicant has questions regarding this Office action, please telephone or e-mail the assigned trademark examining attorney. All relevant e-mail communications will be placed in the official application record; however, an e-mail communication will not be accepted as a response to this Office action and will not extend the deadline for filing a proper response. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05. Further, although the trademark examining attorney may provide additional explanation pertaining to the requirements in this Office action, the trademark examining attorney may not provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights. See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06.

WHO IS PERMITTED TO RESPOND TO THIS PROVISIONAL FULL REFUSAL: Any response to this provisional refusal must be personally signed by an individual applicant, all joint applicants, or someone with legal authority to bind a juristic applicant (e.g., a corporate officer or general partner). 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(b), 2.193(e)(2)(ii); TMEP §712.01. If applicant hires a qualified U.S. attorney to respond on his or her behalf, then the attorney must sign the response. 37 C.F.R. §§2.193(e)(2)(i), 11.18(a); TMEP §§611.03(b), 712.01. Qualified U.S. attorneys include those in good standing with a bar of the highest court of any U.S. state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and other U.S. commonwealths or U.S. territories. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.17(a), 2.62(b), 11.1, 11.14(a); TMEP §§602, 712.01. Additionally, for all responses, the proper signatory must personally sign the document or personally enter his or her electronic signature on the electronic filing. See 37 C.F.R. §2.193(a); TMEP §§611.01(b), 611.02. The name of the signatory must also be printed or typed immediately below or adjacent to the signature, or identified elsewhere in the filing. 37 C.F.R. §2.193(d); TMEP §611.01(b).

In general, foreign attorneys are not permitted to represent applicants before the USPTO (e.g., file written communications, authorize an amendment to an application, or submit legal arguments in response to a requirement or refusal). See 37 C.F.R. §11.14(c), (e); TMEP §§602.03-.03(b), 608.01.

DESIGNATION OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE: The USPTO encourages applicants who do not reside in the United States to designate a domestic representative upon whom any notice or process may be served. TMEP §610; see 15 U.S.C. §§1051(e), 1141h(d); 37 C.F.R. §2.24(a)(1)-(2). Such designations may be filed online at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.

Justin Miller

/Justin Miller/

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 125

(571) 272-6040

justin.miller@uspto.gov

TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: Go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp. Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application. For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov. For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney. E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to this Office action by e-mail.

All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.

WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE: It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants). If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response.

PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION: To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/. Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen. If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199. For more information on checking status, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/.

TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS: Use the TEAS form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.