UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION
U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 79188297
MARK: PRANA
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: |
CLICK HERE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp
|
APPLICANT: Rothcote Holdings Pty. Ltd.
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: |
|
OFFICE ACTION
INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION NO. 1300956
STRICT DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THIS NOTIFICATION: TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF THE REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF PROTECTION OF THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE A COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS PROVISIONAL FULL REFUSAL NOTIFICATION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE “DATE ON WHICH THE NOTIFICATION WAS SENT TO WIPO (MAILING DATE)” LOCATED ON THE WIPO COVER LETTER ACCOMPANYING THIS NOTIFICATION.
In addition to the Mailing Date appearing on the WIPO cover letter, a holder (hereafter “applicant”) may confirm this Mailing Date using the USPTO’s Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/. To do so, enter the U.S. application serial number for this application and then select “Documents.” The Mailing Date used to calculate the response deadline for this provisional full refusal is the “Create/Mail Date” of the “IB-1rst Refusal Note.”
This is a PROVISIONAL FULL REFUSAL of the request for extension of protection of the mark in the above-referenced U.S. application. See 15 U.S.C. §1141h(c). See below in this notification (hereafter “Office action”) for details regarding the provisional full refusal.
INTRODUCTION
REFUSAL – SECTION 2(d) – LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION
Registration of the applied-for mark is refused because of a likelihood of confusion with the mark in U.S. Registration No. 4602401 (“PRANA POWDER” for “Dietary and nutritional supplements; Health food supplements”). Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); see TMEP §§1207.01 et seq. See the attached registration.
In this case, the following factors are the most relevant: similarity of the marks, similarity and nature of the goods and/or services, and similarity of the trade channels of the goods and/or services. See In re Viterra Inc., 671 F.3d 1358, 1361-62, 101 USPQ2d 1905, 1908 (Fed. Cir. 2012); In re Dakin’s Miniatures Inc., 59 USPQ2d 1593, 1595-96 (TTAB 1999); TMEP §§1207.01 et seq.
Comparison of the Marks
Applicant’s applied-for mark is “PRANA.” Registrant’s mark is “PRANA POWDER.” Both marks are in standard character form.
Marks are compared in their entireties for similarities in appearance, sound, connotation, and commercial impression. Stone Lion Capital Partners, LP v. Lion Capital LLP, 746 F.3d 1317, 1321, 110 USPQ2d 1157, 1160 (Fed. Cir. 2014) (quoting Palm Bay Imps., Inc. v. Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin Maison Fondee En 1772, 396 F. 3d 1369, 1371, 73 USPQ2d 1689, 1691 (Fed. Cir. 2005)); TMEP §1207.01(b)-(b)(v). “Similarity in any one of these elements may be sufficient to find the marks confusingly similar.” In re Davia, 110 USPQ2d 1810, 1812 (TTAB 2014) (citing In re 1st USA Realty Prof’ls, Inc., 84 USPQ2d 1581, 1586 (TTAB 2007)); In re White Swan Ltd., 8 USPQ2d 1534, 1535 (TTAB 1988)); TMEP §1207.01(b).
Consumers are generally more inclined to focus on the first word, prefix, or syllable in any trademark or service mark. See Palm Bay Imps., Inc. v. Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin Maison Fondee En 1772, 396 F. 3d 1369, 1372, 73 USPQ2d 1689, 1692 (Fed. Cir. 2005); Presto Prods., Inc. v. Nice-Pak Prods., Inc., 9 USPQ2d 1895, 1897 (TTAB 1988) (“it is often the first part of a mark which is most likely to be impressed upon the mind of a purchaser and remembered” when making purchasing decisions). Furthermore, the second word in the registered mark, “POWDER”, has been disclaimed. Disclaimed matter that is descriptive of or generic for a party’s goods and/or services is typically less significant or less dominant when comparing marks. See In re Dixie Rests., Inc., 105 F.3d 1405, 1407, 41 USPQ2d 1531, 1533-34 (Fed. Cir. 1997); In re Nat’l Data Corp., 753 F.2d at 1060, 224 USPQ at 752; TMEP §1207.01(b)(viii), (c)(ii). Therefore, the “PRANA” portion of the registered mark is the dominant portion of the mark and is what a consumer would primarily focus on.
The first word “PRANA” in the registered mark and applicant’s mark “PRANA” are identical in appearance, sound, and meaning, “and have the potential to be used . . . in exactly the same manner.” In re i.am.symbolic, Llc, 116 USPQ2d 1406, 1411 (TTAB 2015). Additionally, because they are identical, these marks are likely to engender the same connotation and overall commercial impression when considered in connection with applicant’s and registrant’s respective goods and/or services. In re i.am.symbolic, Llc, 116 USPQ2d at 1411.
As such, viewed as a whole, applicant’s mark is substantially similar in sound, appearance, connotation and commercial impression to the registered mark.
Comparison of the Goods
Applicant’s goods are “Carbohydrate based dietary supplements; dietary food supplements; dietary nutritional supplements; dietary protein supplements; dietary supplements; dietary supplements for animals; dietary supplements for infants; dietetic food supplements adapted for medical purposes; energy drinks (dietary supplements); enzyme dietary supplements; fibre supplements; food supplements (dietary supplements); food supplements for animals (minerals); food supplements for animals (trace elements); food supplements for animals (vitamins); food supplements for medical purposes; glucose dietary supplements; herbal dietary supplements; lecithin dietary supplements; linseed dietary supplements; linseed oil dietary supplements; maltodextrins (nutritional supplements); mineral dietary supplements for animals; mineral dietary supplements for humans; mineral food supplements; mineral preparations for use as supplements to drinking water; non-carbohydrate dietary supplements; nutritional animal feed supplements; nutritional feed supplements for animals; nutritional supplements; nutritional supplements for animal feed; nutritional supplements for animals; nutritional supplements for medical use; plant compounds for use as dietary supplements (medicinal); plant compounds for use as dietary supplements (veterinary); plant extracts (dietary supplements); protein dietary supplements; protein supplements for animals; protein supplements for humans; supplements (trace element) for foodstuffs for animals; supplements (trace element) for foodstuffs for human consumption; vitamin preparations in the nature of food supplements; vitamin supplements; vitamin supplements for animals; vitamin supplements for foodstuffs for animals; vitamin supplements for foodstuffs for human consumption; vitamin supplements for use by lactating women; vitamin supplements for use by pregnant women; wheat germ dietary supplements; yeast dietary supplements.”
Registrant’s goods are “Dietary and nutritional supplements; Health food supplements.”
Absent restrictions in an application and/or registration, the identified goods are “presumed to travel in the same channels of trade to the same class of purchasers.” In re Viterra Inc., 671 F.3d 1358, 1362, 101 USPQ2d 1905, 1908 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (quoting Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Packard Press, Inc., 281 F.3d 1261, 1268, 62 USPQ2d 1001, 1005 (Fed. Cir. 2002)). Additionally, unrestricted and broad identifications are presumed to encompass all goods of the type described. See In re Jump Designs, LLC, 80 USPQ2d 1370, 1374 (TTAB 2006) (citing In re Elbaum, 211 USPQ 639, 640 (TTAB 1981)); In re Linkvest S.A., 24 USPQ2d 1716, 1716 (TTAB 1992).
For “dietary supplements” and “nutritional supplements”, the identifications set forth in the application and registration are identical and have no restrictions as to nature, type, channels of trade, or classes of purchasers. Therefore, it is presumed that these goods travel in all normal channels of trade, and are available to the same class of purchasers. See Midwestern Pet Foods, Inc. v. Societe des Produits Nestle S.A., 685 F.3d 1046, 1053, 103 USPQ2d 1435, 1440 (Fed. Cir. 2012). Accordingly, the “dietary supplements” and “nutritional supplements” of the applicant and the registrant are considered related for purposes of the likelihood of confusion analysis.
With respect to applicant’s remaining applied-for goods, the identification set forth in the application and registration has no restrictions as to nature, type, channels of trade, or classes of purchasers. Therefore, it is presumed that these goods travel in all normal channels of trade, and are available to the same class of purchasers. Further, the registration uses broad wording to describe the goods and this wording is presumed to encompass all goods of the type described, including those in applicant’s more narrow identification. Accordingly, the remaining applied-for goods of the applicant and the registrant’s goods are considered related for purposes of the likelihood of confusion analysis.
REQUIREMENT – IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS
Parentheses in the Description of Goods
Therefore, applicant must remove the parentheses from the identification and incorporate any parenthetical information into the description of the goods.
Indefinite Descriptions of Goods
The wording “mineral preparations for use as supplements to drinking water” in the identification of goods is indefinite and must be clarified because the exact nature of the goods is unclear. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01.
Applicant may substitute the following wording, if accurate:
Class 5: Carbohydrate based dietary supplements; dietary food supplements; dietary nutritional supplements; dietary protein supplements; dietary supplements; dietary supplements for animals; dietary supplements for infants; dietetic food supplements adapted for medical purposes; energy drinks dietary supplements; enzyme dietary supplements; dietary fibre supplements; food supplements; mineral food supplements for animals; trace elements food supplements for animals; vitamin food supplements for animals; food supplements for medical purposes; glucose dietary supplements; herbal dietary supplements; lecithin dietary supplements; linseed dietary supplements; linseed oil dietary supplements; maltodextrins nutritional supplements; mineral dietary supplements for animals; mineral dietary supplements for humans; mineral food supplements; mineral preparations to be added to drinking water for use as a dietary supplement; non-carbohydrate dietary supplements; nutritional animal feed supplements; nutritional feed supplements for animals; nutritional supplements; nutritional supplements for animal feed; nutritional supplements for animals; nutritional supplements for medical use; plant compounds for use as medicinal dietary supplements; plant compounds for use as veterinary dietary supplements; plant extract dietary supplements; protein dietary supplements; protein supplements for animals; protein supplements for humans; trace element supplements for foodstuffs for animals; trace element supplements for foodstuffs for human consumption; vitamin preparations in the nature of food supplements; vitamin supplements; vitamin supplements for animals; vitamin supplements for foodstuffs for animals; vitamin supplements for foodstuffs for human consumption; vitamin supplements for use by lactating women; vitamin supplements for use by pregnant women; wheat germ dietary supplements; yeast dietary supplements
See TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03.
An applicant may only amend an identification to clarify or limit the goods, but not to add to or broaden the scope of the goods. 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); see TMEP §§1402.06 et seq., 1402.07.
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual. See TMEP §1402.04.
REQUIREMENT – TRANSLATION STATEMENT
The following translation statement is suggested:
The English translation of the word “PRANA” in the mark is “breath.”
TMEP §809.03. See attached translation evidence from Oxford Dictionaries.
REQUIREMENT – ENTITY CLARIFICATION
The application identifies applicant as an “Australian Company.” This is not an acceptable entity designation because the term "company" is indefinite for describing a United States entity because it does not identify a particular juristic entity. See TMEP §803.03(c). See TMEP §803.03. Therefore, applicant must specify the type of entity applying, for example, “limited company” or “corporation.”
Applicant also states that it is incorporated in Queensland. However, applicant must specify the foreign country under whose laws the applicant is organized or in which it is incorporated. 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(3)(ii); TMEP §§803.03(c), 803.04. For example, Australia.
CONCLUSION
If applicant has questions regarding this Office action, please telephone or e-mail the assigned trademark examining attorney. All relevant e-mail communications will be placed in the official application record; however, an e-mail communication will not be accepted as a response to this Office action and will not extend the deadline for filing a proper response. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05. Further, although the trademark examining attorney may provide additional explanation pertaining to the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action, the trademark examining attorney may not provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights. See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06.
WHO IS PERMITTED TO RESPOND TO THIS PROVISIONAL FULL REFUSAL: Any response to this provisional refusal must be personally signed by an individual applicant, all joint applicants, or someone with legal authority to bind a juristic applicant (e.g., a corporate officer or general partner). 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(b), 2.193(e)(2)(ii); TMEP §712.01. If applicant hires a qualified U.S. attorney to respond on his or her behalf, then the attorney must sign the response. 37 C.F.R. §§2.193(e)(2)(i), 11.18(a); TMEP §§611.03(b), 712.01. Qualified U.S. attorneys include those in good standing with a bar of the highest court of any U.S. state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and other U.S. commonwealths or U.S. territories. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.17(a), 2.62(b), 11.1, 11.14(a); TMEP §§602, 712.01. Additionally, for all responses, the proper signatory must personally sign the document or personally enter his or her electronic signature on the electronic filing. See 37 C.F.R. §2.193(a); TMEP §§611.01(b), 611.02. The name of the signatory must also be printed or typed immediately below or adjacent to the signature, or identified elsewhere in the filing. 37 C.F.R. §2.193(d); TMEP §611.01(b).
In general, foreign attorneys are not permitted to represent applicants before the USPTO (e.g., file written communications, authorize an amendment to an application, or submit legal arguments in response to a requirement or refusal). See 37 C.F.R. §11.14(c), (e); TMEP §§602.03-.03(b), 608.01.
DESIGNATION OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE: The USPTO encourages applicants who do not reside in the United States to designate a domestic representative upon whom any notice or process may be served. TMEP §610; see 15 U.S.C. §§1051(e), 1141h(d); 37 C.F.R. §2.24(a)(1)-(2). Such designations may be filed online at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.
/Stefan M. Oehrlein/
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 115
(571) 272-1308
stefan.oehrlein@uspto.gov
TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: Go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp. Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application. For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov. For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney. E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to this Office action by e-mail.
All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.
WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE: It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants). If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response.
PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION: To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/. Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen. If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199. For more information on checking status, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/.
TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS: Use the TEAS form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.