Trademark Filing
Lynmarden Pty Ltd
Application Filed: 2011-09-08
Trademark Application Details
REGISTERED
| Serial Number | 79109167 |
| Registration Number | 4389976 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 2000: Illustration: Drawing or design without any word(s)/letter(s)/ number(s) |
| Attorney Name | Mainak H. Mehta |
| Attorney Docket Number | 120776LPL002 |
| Law Office Assigned | M50 |
| Employee Name | I, DAVID C |
Timeline
| 2011-09-08 | Application Filed |
| 2013-06-11 | Published for Opposition |
| 2013-08-27 | Status: Live/Registered |
| 2013-08-27 | Trademark Registered |
| 2019-08-15 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 114 |
| 2019-08-16 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Lynmarden Pty Ltd |
| Address | 8/1 Kenilworth Parade IVANHOE VIC AU 3079 |
| Legal Entity Type | Company |
| Legal Entity State | AU |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Design Search Codes
| 011508 | Raindrop (a single drop); Single drop (rain, tear, etc.); Teardrop (a single drop) |
| 260121 | Circles that are totally or partially shaded. |
| 260502 | Plain single line triangles; Triangles, plain single line |
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 20 |
| U.S. Codes: | 002,013,022,025,032,050 |
| International Codes: | 21 |
| U.S. Codes: | 002,013,023,029,030,033,040,050 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| CC0000 | The color(s) blue and white is/are claimed as a feature of the mark. |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | 2012-03-01 | 1 REPR M: |
| NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2012-03-02 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2012-03-02 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | 2012-03-06 | 4 MAFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2012-03-08 | 5 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | 2012-03-09 | 6 RFCR E:E-Mail |
| REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | 2012-03-09 | 7 RFRR P: |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | 2012-03-09 | 8 RFCS P: |
| REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | 2012-03-30 | 9 RFNT P: |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2012-09-04 | 10 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2012-09-04 | 11 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2012-09-05 | 12 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2012-10-24 | 13 CNFR R:Renewal |
| FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2012-10-24 | 14 GNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | 2012-10-24 | 15 GNFN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | 2013-04-23 | 16 ERFR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2013-04-23 | 17 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2013-04-23 | 18 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2013-04-24 | 19 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2013-05-03 | 20 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2013-05-06 | 21 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | 2013-05-22 | 22 NONP E:E-Mail |
| NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | 2013-05-22 | 23 OP2R P: |
| NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | 2013-05-22 | 24 OPNS P: |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2013-06-11 | 25 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | 2013-06-11 | 26 NPUB E:E-Mail |
| NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | 2013-08-17 | 27 GPNX P: |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2013-08-27 | 28 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | 2013-11-27 | 29 FICR P: |
| FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | 2013-11-29 | 30 FIMP P: |
| FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | 2013-11-29 | 31 FICS P: |
| FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | 2013-12-24 | 32 FINO P: |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2014-09-08 | 33 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | 2016-12-16 | 34 NREP P: |
| NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | 2017-02-09 | 35 NREP P: |
| NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | 2017-05-18 | 36 NREP P: |
| NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | 2017-07-27 | 37 NREP P: |
| COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | 2018-08-27 | 38 REM3 E:E-Mail |
| TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | 2019-08-12 | 39 ES75 I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | 2019-08-15 | 40 APRE A:Allowance for Publication |
| POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | 2019-08-15 | 41 PR75 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | 2020-02-11 | 42 EROP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | 2020-02-18 | 43 C75A O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | 2020-02-18 | 44 NA75 E:E-Mail |
| INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | 2021-10-15 | 45 RNWL P: |
| COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | 2022-08-27 | 46 REM4 E:E-Mail |
| TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | 2024-01-18 | 47 ES75 I:Incoming Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 