Offc Action Outgoing

TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW.

ISSUE/MAILING DATE:

INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION NO. 1099660

This is a PROVISIONAL FULL REFUSAL of the trademark in the above-referenced U.S. application. See 15 U.S.C. §1141h(c).

WHO IS PERMITTED TO RESPOND TO THIS PROVISIONAL FULL REFUSAL:

Applicant may respond directly to this provisional refusal Office action if applicant is not represented by an authorized attorney. See 37 C.F.R. §2.193(e)(2)(ii). Otherwise, applicant’s authorized attorney must respond on applicant’s behalf. See 37 C.F.R. §2.193(e)(2)(i). However, the only attorneys who are authorized to sign responses and practice before the USPTO in trademark matters are as follows:

(1) Attorneys in good standing with a bar of the highest court of any U.S. state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and other federal territories and possessions of the United States.

(2) Canadian agents/attorneys who represent applicants located in Canada and (a) are registered with the USPTO and in good standing as patent agents or (b) have been granted reciprocal recognition by the USPTO.

See 37 C.F.R. §§2.17(e), 2.62(b), 11.1, 11.5(b)(2), 11.14(a), (c); TMEP §§602, 712.03.

Foreign attorneys, other than authorized Canadian attorneys, are not permitted to represent applicants before the USPTO. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.17(e), 11.14(c), (e); TMEP §602.03-.03(b). That is, foreign attorneys may not file written communications, authorize an amendment to an application, or submit legal arguments in response to a requirement or refusal, among other things. See 37 C.F.R. §11.5(b)(2); TMEP §§602.03(c), 608.01. If applicant is represented by such a foreign attorney, applicant must respond directly to this provisional refusal Office action. See 37 C.F.R. §2.193(e)(2)(ii).

DESIGNATION OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE:

The USPTO encourages applicants who do not reside in the U.S. to designate a domestic representative upon whom notices or process may be served. 15 U.S.C. §§1051(e), 1141h(d); 37 C.F.R. §2.24(a)(1)-(2); see TMEP §610. Such designations may be filed online at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/index.jsp.

THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN PROVISIONALLY REFUSED AS FOLLOWS:

The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issues below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.

SEARCH RESULTS

The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).

SIGNIFICANCE INQUIRY – RESPONSE REQUIRED

Applicant must explain whether “ECL” has any meaning or significance in the industry in which the goods are manufactured/provided, or if such wording is a “term of art” within applicant’s industry. Applicant must also explain whether this wording has any meaning as an acronym or abbreviation. See 37 C.F.R. §2.61(b); TMEP §814.

Failure to respond to a request for information is an additional ground for refusing registration. See In re Cheezwhse.com, Inc., 85 USPQ2d 1917, 1919 (TTAB 2008); In re DTI P’ship LLP, 67 USPQ2d 1699, 1701 (TTAB 2003); TMEP §814.

AMENDMENT TO THE IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS REQUIRED

The identification of goods is indefinite and must be clarified. See TMEP §1402.01. Applicant must specify the common commercial or generic name for the goods. If there is no common commercial or generic name, applicant must describe the product and intended consumer as well as its main purpose and intended uses.

Recommended changes have been highlighted in bold and suggestions for amending applicant’s identification of goods are in brackets.

PLEASE NOTE: If applicant adopts the recommended identification of goods, applicant must remove any brackets from the identification of goods and incorporate the bracketed information into the amended description. The identification of goods and/or services contains parentheses. Generally, parentheses and brackets should not be used in identifications. Parenthetical information is permitted in identifications only if it serves to explain or translate the matter immediately preceding the parenthetical phrase in such a way that it does not affect the clarity of the identification, e.g., “obi (Japanese sash).” TMEP §1402.12.

Applicant may adopt the following identification of goods, if accurate:

International Class 002: Colorants and paints in the color white; pigments; food dyes; printing ink; paints; aluminium paints; coatings, namely, ________ [applicant to specify the generic or common commercial name for the coatings, e.g., stains and clear finishes for exterior and interior use on a variety of substrates, coatings for wood as paints, coatings in the nature of automobile finishing, etc.]; water repellent coating, namely, ________ [applicant to specify the generic or common commercial name for the water repellent coating e.g., coatings in the nature of industrial sealants for waterproofing and surface hardening, coating preparations having water repellent properties, water-based metallic coatings in the form of sprays and liquid gels, etc.]; anti-corrosive preparations, namely, ________ [applicant to specify the generic or common commercial name for the anti-corrosive preparations, e.g., anticorrosive paints, corrosion inhibitants in the nature of a coating, anti-corrosive papers, etc.]; natural resins in the nature of mastics; bactericidal paints; ceramic paints; fireproof paints; primers; non-sticky chemical coating for non-stick pan, namely, ________ [applicant to specify the generic or common commercial name for the non-sticky chemical coating, e.g., non-stick coatings in the nature of paint, coatings for metal finishing that contain thermal setting resins and thermal plastic resins etc.]; protective preparations for metals, namely, ________ [applicant to specify the generic or common commercial name for the protective preparations, e.g., metallic inks, metals in foil and powder form for painters, pre-treatment coatings for inorganic metal surfaces to improve adhesion and corrosion resistance etc.]

TMEP §1402.01.

An applicant may amend an identification of goods only to clarify or limit the goods; adding to or broadening the scope of the goods is not permitted. 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); see TMEP §§1402.06 et seq., 1402.07 et seq.

For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and/or services in trademark applications, please see the online searchable Manual of Acceptable Identifications of Goods and Services at http://tess2.gov.uspto.report/netahtml/tidm.html. See TMEP §1402.04.

ADVISORY – 66(a) APPLICATIONS – CLASSIFICATION FOR GOODS/SERVICES CANNOT BE CHANGED

The international classification of goods and/or services in applications filed under Trademark Act Section 66(a) cannot be changed from the classification given to the goods and/or services by the International Bureau in the corresponding international registration. 37 C.F.R. §2.85(d);TMEP §§1401.03(d), 1904.02(b).

RESPONSE GUIDELINES

To expedite prosecution of the application, applicant is encouraged to file its response to this Office action online via the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), which is available at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html. If applicant has technical questions about the TEAS response to Office action form, applicant can review the electronic filing tips available online at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eFilingTips.htm and email technical questions to TEAS@uspto.gov.

If applicant has questions about its application or needs assistance in responding to this Office action, please telephone the assigned trademark examining attorney directly at the number below.

/Charisma Hampton/

Trademark Examining Attorney

U.S. Patent & Trademark Office

Charisma.Hampton@uspto.gov

571-270-1522

Law Office 112

TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: Go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp. Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using TEAS, to allow for necessary system updates of the application. For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov. For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney. E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to this Office action by e-mail.

All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.

WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE: It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants). If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response.

PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION: To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) at http://tarr.gov.uspto.report/. Please keep a copy of the complete TARR screen. If TARR shows no change for more than six months, call 1-800-786-9199. For more information on checking status, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/.

TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS: Use the TEAS form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageE.htm.