IR-Owner Change

STAMPEDE

Robovision Limited

New Name Transaction

NEW HOLDER/REPRESENTATIVE OF AN INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION

SERIAL NUMBER: 79101131

The table below presents the data as entered.

Input Field	Entered
OVERVIEW
INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION NUMBER	1086983
EFFECTIVE DATE OF MODIFICATION	08/08/2012
NOTIFICATION DATE	10/25/2012
HOLDER DETAILS
CLIENT IDENTIFIER	826436
NOTIFICATION LANGUAGE	ENGLISH
NAME	Robovision Limited
ADDRESS	Unit 11, Enterprise Way
	Flitwick, Bedfordshire MK45 5BX
COUNTRY	United Kingdom
ENTITLEMENT NATIONALITY OF APPLICANT/TRANSFEREE/HOLDER	United Kingdom
ENTITLEMENT ESTABLISHMENT	United Kingdom
ENTITLEMENT DOMICILED	GB
LEGAL NATURE	Incorporated under the laws of England and Wales
LEGAL NATURE: PLACE INCORPORATED	Not provided
CORRESPONDENCE INDICATOR	YES
REPRESENTATIVE GROUP
CLIENT IDENTIFIER	740139
NAME	Barker Brettell LLP
ADDRESS	100 Hagley Road
	Edgbaston, Birmingham B16 8QQ
COUNTRY	United Kingdom
PREVIOUS HOLDER DETAILS
CLIENT IDENTIFIER	702501
NAME	Tube Plastics Limited
ADDRESS	Severn Road, Stourport-on-Severn,
	Worcestershire DY13 9EX
COUNTRY	United Kingdom
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION
IB DOCUMENT ID	686099101
OFFICE REFERENCE	79101131
TRANSACTION TYPE	TRN - TRANSFER

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.