PTO Form 1957 (Rev 9/2005) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp. 04/2009) |
Input Field |
Entered |
---|---|
SERIAL NUMBER | 79037910 |
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED | LAW OFFICE 115 |
MARK SECTION (no change) | |
ARGUMENT(S) | |
REMARKS This is in response to the Office Action dated January 3, 2008. The Examining Attorney has continued and maintained theconfusing similarity refusal based on U.S. Trademark Registration No. 2,675,862 for THE BULLDOG SHOP with respect to only certain goods. Additionally, the Examining Attorney has objected to Applicant's amended identification of goods under the mark. AMENDED IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS Applicant has, elsewhere in this electronic reply, amended the identification of goods under the mark, and thus the identification is now in proper form. In view of this amendment, which also takes the confusing similarity refusal into consideration by deleting the goods upon which it was based, Applicant submits that its mark is not likely to be confused with Registrant's mark, as the proposed goods under the mark as filed with this response are different than those services under Registrant's mark. CONCLUSION In view of the foregoing, Applicant respectfully requests that the Examining Attorney withdraw the confusing similarity refusal, accept the amended identification of goods and allow the mark to proceed for publication purposes. Respectfully Submitted, J. Matthew Pritchard, Reg. No. 46,228 Attorney of Record |
|
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (003)(current) | |
INTERNATIONAL CLASS | 003 |
DESCRIPTION | |
Non-medicated toiletries; body deodorant, anti-perspirants, shower gel; body wash, facial cleanser, facial scrub; facial wash, hand wash, soaps; non-medicated skincare preparations; body mist spray; spot sticks, namely, non-medicated acne treatment preparations; skin moisturisers; body lotion, body moisturiser, facial moisturiser; shaving gel, shaving oil, shaving cream, shaving foam, shaving spritz, shaving soap, after-shave; after-shave gel, after-shave balm; hair removal preparations and creams, depilatory preparations, depilatory wax; hair care preparations; shampoo, conditioner, hair gel, hair wax, hair spritz, hairspray; perfumery; eau de toilette; essential oils; cosmetics; dentifrices; lip balm; moustache wax; cosmetic kits; sunscreen preparations | |
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (003)(proposed) | |
INTERNATIONAL CLASS | 003 |
DESCRIPTION | |
Non-medicated toiletries; body deodorant, anti-perspirants, shower gel; body wash, facial cleanser, facial scrub; facial wash, hand wash, soaps; non-medicated skincare preparations; body mist spray; spot sticks, namely, non-medicated acne treatment preparations; skin moisturisers; body lotion, body moisturiser, facial moisturiser; shaving gel, shaving oil, shaving cream, shaving foam, shaving spritz, shaving soap, after-shave; after-shave gel, after-shave balm; hair removal preparations and creams, depilatory preparations, depilatory wax; shampoo, conditioner, perfumery; eau de toilette; essential oils; dentifrices; lip balm; moustache wax; sunscreen preparations | |
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (005)(no change) | |
SIGNATURE SECTION | |
DECLARATION SIGNATURE | The filing Attorney has elected not to submit the signed declaration, believing no supporting declaration is required under the Trademark Rules of Practice. |
RESPONSE SIGNATURE | /JMP/ |
SIGNATORY'S NAME | J. Matthew Pritchard, Reg. No. 46,228; 1084-074654 |
SIGNATORY'S POSITION | Attorney of Record |
DATE SIGNED | 06/17/2008 |
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY | YES |
FILING INFORMATION SECTION | |
SUBMIT DATE | Tue Jun 17 14:04:20 EDT 2008 |
TEAS STAMP | USPTO/ROA-XX.XX.XXX.XXX-2 0080617140420567395-79037 910-420f759561c9ac8b69c4d 05989f801c5d-N/A-N/A-2008 0617140158095685 |
PTO Form 1957 (Rev 9/2005) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp. 04/2009) |
REMARKS
This is in response to the Office Action dated January 3, 2008.
The Examining Attorney has continued and maintained theconfusing similarity refusal based on U.S. Trademark Registration No. 2,675,862 for THE BULLDOG SHOP with respect to only certain goods. Additionally, the Examining Attorney has objected to Applicant's amended identification of goods under the mark.
AMENDED IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS
Applicant has, elsewhere in this electronic reply, amended the identification of goods under the mark, and thus the identification is now in proper form. In view of this amendment, which also takes the confusing similarity refusal into consideration by deleting the goods upon which it was based, Applicant submits that its mark is not likely to be confused with Registrant's mark, as the proposed goods under the mark as filed with this response are different than those services under Registrant's mark.
CONCLUSION
In view of the foregoing, Applicant respectfully requests that the Examining Attorney withdraw the confusing similarity refusal, accept the amended identification of goods and allow the mark to proceed for publication purposes.
Respectfully Submitted,
J. Matthew Pritchard, Reg. No. 46,228
Attorney of Record