Research |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Serial Number | 79017225 |
Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
Cancellation Code | H |
Law Office Assigned | M40 |
Employee Name | MURRAY, DAVID T |
2005-03-25 | Application Filed |
2006-07-06 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
2015-03-25 | Abandon |
2015-03-25 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | ![]() |
Entity Statement | Société anoynme |
Address | 2600, route des Crêtes Gaia II F-06905 VALBONNE SOPHIA ANTIPOLIS FR |
Legal Entity Type | |
Legal Entity State | FR |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
International Codes: | 9 |
U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
International Codes: | 38 |
U.S. Codes: | 100,101,104 |
International Codes: | 40 |
U.S. Codes: | 100,103,106 |
International Codes: | 42 |
U.S. Codes: | 100,101 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0091 | Scientific, surveying, photographic, cinematographic, optical, measuring, signalling, and checking (supervision) apparatus and instruments; data processing equipment, namely computers and peripherals; data carriers for computer software (computer programs) (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13;2;b) of the Common Regulations); equipment for databases and for access to databases (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13;2;b) of the Common Regulations); computer software for processing and analysing photographs such as aerial and satellites photographs; computer software for stereographic projections, digital land models, orthoimages and thematic maps; computerized files and software for geography, geology and topography; computerized files and software for ground mapping and digital maps |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | 2005-11-28 | 1 REPR M: |
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2005-11-30 | 2 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2005-11-30 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2005-12-01 | 4 CNRT R:Renewal |
NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | 2005-12-02 | 5 RFCR E:E-Mail |
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | 2005-12-06 | 6 RFCS P: |
REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | 2006-01-05 | 7 RFNT P: |
ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2006-07-06 | 8 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2006-07-07 | 9 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | 2006-12-28 | 10 LIMG M: |
NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | 2007-04-26 | 11 OPNR P: |
NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | 2007-04-26 | 12 OPNS P: |
NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | 2007-05-10 | 13 OPNX P: |
FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | 2007-07-06 | 14 FICR P: |
FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | 2007-07-06 | 15 FICS P: |
FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | 2007-08-10 | 16 FINT P: |
DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | 2015-10-16 | 17 DETH P: |
NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | 2015-10-17 | 18 DENA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.