UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

RESPONSE TIME LIMIT:  TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, THE OFFICE MUST RECEIVE A PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE MAILING OR E-MAILING DATE. 

 

 

Serial Number  79/007933

 

INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION NO. 0840484

 

This is a PROVISIONAL FULL REFUSAL of the trademark and/or service mark in the above-referenced U.S. application.  15 U.S.C. §1141h(c).

 

APPLICANT OR ATTORNEY CAN RESPOND TO PROVISIONAL REFUSAL:

 

Applicant may respond directly to this provisional refusal Office action, or applicant’s attorney may respond on applicant’s behalf. 

 

NOTE:  Attorneys hired to represent an applicant in a trademark matter before the Office must be eligible under 37 C.F.R. §10.14:

 

(1)     Attorneys residing in the United States who are in good standing with the bar of any United States court or the highest court of any state, may practice before the Office in trademark matters.

(2)     A foreign attorney not residing in the United States who is in good standing before the patent or trademark office of the country in which he or she resides, may practice before the Office in trademark matters only in cases where the patent and trademark office of that foreign country allows substantially reciprocal privileges to those permitted to practice before the Office.  Currently, Canadian attorneys are the only foreign attorneys recognized as meeting this criterion.  A foreign attorney who meets the requirements of 37 C.F.R. §10.14(c) can only represent parties located in the country in which the foreign attorney resides and practices.  TMEP §602.

 

The Office cannot aid in the selection of an attorney.  37 C.F.R. §2.11.

 

If applicant is not represented by an attorney, applicant may appoint a domestic representative who would receive correspondence from the Office and be served process or notice of proceedings affecting the application.  15 U.S.C. §1141h(d); 37 C.F.R. §2.24.

 

THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN PROVISIONALLY REFUSED AS FOLLOWS:

 

The assigned trademark examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application, and has determined the following.

 

Identification of Goods

The entire identification of goods is indefinite and must be amended to specify the common commercial names of the goods.  In the identification, the applicant must use the common commercial names for the goods, be as complete and specific as possible and avoid the use of indefinite words and phrases.  If the applicant chooses to use indefinite terms, such as "accessories," "apparatus," "components," "devices," "equipment," "instruments," "materials," "parts," "systems" and "products," then those words must be followed by the word "namely" and the goods listed by their common commercial names.  TMEP §§1402.01 and 1402.03(a).

 

Class 7:            Machines and machine tools for chopping wood, not included in other classes, namely, wood [specify, e.g., chipping, grilling, grinding, milling, planing, and sawing] machines, and accessories, therefor, namely, [specify the common commercial names of the accessories].

 

Please note that, while the identification of goods may be amended to clarify or limit the goods, adding to the goods or broadening the scope of the goods is not permitted.  37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Therefore, applicant may not amend the identification to include goods that are not within the scope of the goods set forth in the present identification.

 

The international classification of goods and/or services in applications filed under Trademark Act Section 66(a) cannot be changed from the classification given to the goods and/or services by the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization in the corresponding international registration.  TMEP §§1401.03(d), 1401.04 and 1904.02(b).  Therefore, the applicant may not amend the identification to include goods in other classes such as axes or hatchets, which are Class 8 goods.

 

Entity

Applicant must specify its country of incorporation.  37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(3)(ii); TMEP §§803.03(c) and 803.04.

 

Drawing

Applicant must submit a new drawing showing the entire mark clearly and conforming to 37 C.F.R. §§2.52, 2.53(c) and 2.54(e).  The current drawing is not acceptable because there are fuzzy dots between the letters and near the ax that do not appear to be intended as a part of the drawing, and it will not reproduce satisfactorily. 

 

Special-Form Drawing through TEAS  - Requirements

To submit a special form drawing electronically, applicant must attach a digitized image of the mark to the submission.  The digitized image must be in .jpg format, formatted at no less than 300 dots per inch and no more than 350 dots per inch.  The Office recommends that the digitized image of the mark have a length and width of no smaller than 250 pixels and no larger than 944 pixels.  37 C.F.R. §2.53(c); TMEP §807.05(c).  All lines in the image must be clean, sharp and solid, and not fine or crowded, and produce a high quality image when copied.

 

 

 

NOTICE:  FEE CHANGE   

 

Effective January 31, 2005 and pursuant to the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005, Pub. L. 108-447, the following are the fees that will be charged for filing a trademark application:

 

(1) $325 per international class if filed electronically using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS); or 

 

(2)   $375 per international class if filed on paper

 

These fees will be charged not only when a new application is filed, but also when payments are made to add classes to an existing application. If such payments are submitted with a TEAS response, the fee will be  $325 per class, and if such payments are made with a paper response, the fee will be $375 per class.

 

The new fee requirements will apply to any fees filed on or after January 31, 2005.

 

NOTICE:  TRADEMARK OPERATION RELOCATION

 

The Trademark Operation has relocated to Alexandria, Virginia.  Effective October 4, 2004, all Trademark-related paper mail (except documents sent to the Assignment Services Division for recordation, certain documents filed under the Madrid Protocol, and requests for copies of trademark documents) must be sent to:

 

Commissioner for Trademarks

P.O. Box 1451

Alexandria, VA  22313-1451

 

Applicants, attorneys and other Trademark customers are strongly encouraged to correspond with the USPTO online via the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html.

 

 

/rscb/

Robin S. Chosid-Brown

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 102

(571) 272-9252

robin.chosid-brown@uspto.gov

 

 

HOW TO RESPOND TO THIS OFFICE ACTION:

• ONLINE RESPONSE:  You may respond formally using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) Response to Office Action form (visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html and follow the instructions, but if the Office Action issued via email you must wait 72 hours after receipt of the Office Action to respond via TEAS).
• REGULAR MAIL RESPONSE:  To respond by regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing return address above and include the serial number, law office number and examining attorney’s name in your response.

 

STATUS OF APPLICATION: To check the status of your application, visit the Office’s Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) system at http://tarr.uspto.gov.

 

VIEW APPLICATION DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Documents in the electronic file for pending applications can be viewed and downloaded online at http://portal.gov.uspto.report/external/portal/tow.

 

GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION: For general information about trademarks, please visit the Office’s website at http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm

 

FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY SPECIFIED ABOVE.