Offc Action Outgoing

NXL

G.I. SPORTZ INC.

78168343 - NXL - 08193.0029-00000

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
To: Procaps Encapsulation Inc. (docketing@finnegan.com)
Subject: 78168343 - NXL - 08193.0029-00000
Sent: 3/2/03 4:09:06 PM
Sent As: ECom102
Attachments: Attachment - 1

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

 

    SERIAL NO: 78/168343

 

    APPLICANT:                          Procaps Encapsulation Inc.

 

 

        

 

    CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

    FINNEGAN HENDERSON

    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett &

    1300 I ST NW FL 6

    WASHINGTON DC 20005-3315

   

RETURN ADDRESS: 

Commissioner for Trademarks

2900 Crystal Drive

Arlington, VA 22202-3513

ecom102@uspto.gov

 

 

 

    MARK:          NXL

 

 

 

    CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:   08193.0029-00000

 

    CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS: 

 docketing@finnegan.com

Please provide in all correspondence:

 

1.  Filing date, serial number, mark and

     applicant's name.

2.  Date of this Office Action.

3.  Examining Attorney's name and

     Law Office number.

4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, WE MUST RECEIVE A PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF OUR MAILING OR E-MAILING DATE. 

 

 

Serial Number  78/168343

 

The assigned examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application and determined the following.

 

NO CONFLICTING REGISTERED MARK NOTED

 

The examining attorney has searched the Office records and has found no similar registered mark which bars registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).  TMEP §704.02.  Please note that the examining attorney has found a potentially conflicting pending application.

 

POTENTIAL CITATION OF PRIOR-FILED APPLICATION

 

The examining attorney encloses information regarding pending Application Serial No. 76/370854.  The filing date of the referenced application precedes the applicant’s filing date.  There may be a likelihood of confusion between the two marks under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).  If the referenced application matures into a registration, the examining attorney may refuse registration in this case under Section 2(d).  37 C.F.R. §2.83; TMEP §1208.01.

 

Action on this application will be suspended pending the disposition of Application Serial No. 76/370854, upon receipt of the applicant’s response resolving the following informalities.

 

IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS AND SERVICES

 

The wording “PAINTBALL EQUIPMENT,” “PAINTBALL ACCESSORIES,” “SPORTING GOODS” and “SPORTING EQUIPMENT” in the identification of goods is unacceptable as indefinite.  In the identification, the applicant must use the common commercial names for the goods, be as complete and specific as possible and avoid the use of indefinite words and phrases.  If the applicant chooses to use indefinite terms, such as “accessories,” “components,” “devices,” “equipment,” “materials,” “parts,” “systems” and “products,” then those words must be followed by the word “namely” and the goods listed by their common commercial names.  TMEP §§1402.01 and 1402.03(a).

 

The applicant may adopt the following identification(s) of goods, if accurate: 

 

PAINTBALL HELMETS, in International Class 9.

 

AMMUNITION FOR PAINTBALL GUNS, in International Class 28.

 

Likewise, the wording “SPORTING ACTIVITIES” in the recitation of services is unacceptable as indefinite.  The applicant must amend the recitation to specify the common commercial name of the services or to indicate their nature.  TMEP §1402.11.

 

For assistance regarding an acceptable listing of goods and/or services, please see the on‑line searchable Manual of Acceptable Identifications of Goods and Services, at http://www.gov.uspto.report/web/offices/tac/doc/gsmanual/.

 

Please note that, while an application may be amended to clarify or limit the identification, additions to the identification are not permitted.  37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Therefore, the applicant may not amend to include any goods or services that are not within the scope of the goods and services recited in the present identification.

 

REQUIREMENTS FOR A MULTIPLE-CLASS APPLICATION

 

The application identifies goods/services that may be classified in more than two (2) international classes.  Therefore, the applicant must either:  (1) restrict the application to the number of class(es) covered by the fee already paid, or (2) pay the required fee for each additional class(es).  37 C.F.R. §2.86(a)(2); TMEP §§810.01, 1401.04, 1401.04(b) and 1403.01. 

 

If the applicant prosecutes this application as a combined, or multiple‑class, application, the applicant must comply with each of the following.

 

(1)  The applicant must list the goods/services by international class with the classes listed in ascending numerical order.  TMEP §1403.01.

 

(2)  The applicant must submit a filing fee for each international class of goods/services not covered by the fee already paid.  37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1) and 2.86(a); TMEP §§810.01 and 1403.01.  Effective January 1, 2003, the fee for filing a trademark application is $335 for each class.  This applies to classes added to pending applications as well as to new applications filed on or after that date.  

 

RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER

 

No set form is required for response to this Office action.  The applicant must respond to each point raised.  The applicant should simply set forth the required changes or statements and request that the Office enter them.  The applicant must sign the response.  In addition to the identifying information required at the beginning of this letter, the applicant should provide a telephone number to speed up further processing.

 

If the applicant has any questions or needs assistance in responding to this Office action, please telephone the assigned examining attorney.

 

PLEASE NOTE:  All of the issues raised can be resolved by telephone or electronic mail.  The applicant may telephone or e-mail the examining attorney, instead of submitting a written response, to expedite the application.

 

/MVS/

Maria-Victoria Suarez

Trademark Attorney

Law Office 102

(703) 308-9102, x196

Fax - (703) 872-9231

maria-victoria.suarez@uspto.gov

 

 

How to respond to this Office Action:

 

To respond formally using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html and follow the instructions.

 

To respond formally via E-mail, visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/web/trademarks/tmelecresp.htm and follow the instructions.

 

To respond formally via regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing Return Address listed above and include the serial number, law office and examining attorney’s name on the upper right corner of each page of your response.

 

To check the status of your application at any time, visit the Office’s Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) system at http://tarr.gov.uspto.report/

 

For general and other useful information about trademarks, you are encouraged to visit the Office’s web site at http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm

 

FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY.

 

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed