TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic

SLIDER

World Sports Products, Inc.

TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic

PTO Form 2194 (Rev 9/2005)
OMB No. 0651-0054 (Exp. 11/30/2008)

Petition To Revive For Office Action


The table below presents the data as entered.

Input Field
Entered
SERIAL NUMBER 78913307
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED LAW OFFICE 103
DATE OF NOTICE OF ABANDONMENT 07/06/2007
PETITION
PETITION STATEMENT Applicant has firsthand knowledge that the failure to respond to the Office Action by the specified deadline was unintentional, and requests the USPTO to revive the abandoned application.
RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION
MARK SECTION (no change)
ARGUMENT(S)

The examining attorney has refused the mark "Slider" based on the term being descriptive of one of the products, a pitching machine.

First, the rest of the mark should have not been refused because the mark also refers to Ball cages, Ball pitching screens, Baseballs, Baseballs not soft, Softballs, Tennis balls, Ball batting tees, Batting gloves, and Ball return apparatus for baseball, softball, and tennis.  Non-of the above types of products throw breaking balls and should not have been rejected for registration.

Second, when refering to "Slider" as a pitching machine, the product has become so well known that there could be no confusion.  Similar to when Microsoft trademarked "Windows".  Even though the computer screen was known as a window, the name was so well known to represent the software titled "Windows" that the trademark office allowed the trademark of "Windows" to Microsoft.

If you look on the interenet, you will find the Slider (pitching machine) on most of the largest sites in the country.  In additon, Dick's Sporting Goods for example carries the Slider pitching machine and also ran a national advertisement in November of 2006 promoting the Slider in their stores.

Since the Slider has become so well known, similiar to Microsoft's "Windows", I would ask the examing attorney to accept the trademark because the name is snynonimous with the pitching machine made by us.  Also, because the Slider Pitching Machine is so popular that there would be no confusion with other products that throw a slider pitch.    

PAYMENT SECTION
TOTAL AMOUNT 100
TOTAL FEES DUE 100
SIGNATURE SECTION
RESPONSE SIGNATURE /William C. Lay/
SIGNATORY'S NAME William C. Lay
SIGNATORY'S POSITION President
DATE SIGNED 08/16/2007
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY YES
FILING INFORMATION SECTION
SUBMIT DATE Thu Aug 16 13:01:48 EDT 2007
TEAS STAMP USPTO/POA-XXX.XX.XXX.XX-2
0070816130148674078-78913
307-3806546505943f1e4603c
5122449c3a9e71-CC-7052-20
070816121055559198



PTO Form 2194 (Rev 9/2005)
OMB No. 0651-0054 (Exp. 11/30/2008)

Petition To Revive For Office Action


To the Commissioner for Trademarks:

Application serial no. 78913307 has been amended as follows:
PETITION
Petition Statement

Applicant has firsthand knowledge that the failure to respond to the Office Action by the specified deadline was unintentional, and requests the USPTO to revive the abandoned application.

RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION

ARGUMENT(S)
In response to the substantive refusal(s), please note the following:

The examining attorney has refused the mark "Slider" based on the term being descriptive of one of the products, a pitching machine.

First, the rest of the mark should have not been refused because the mark also refers to Ball cages, Ball pitching screens, Baseballs, Baseballs not soft, Softballs, Tennis balls, Ball batting tees, Batting gloves, and Ball return apparatus for baseball, softball, and tennis.  Non-of the above types of products throw breaking balls and should not have been rejected for registration.

Second, when refering to "Slider" as a pitching machine, the product has become so well known that there could be no confusion.  Similar to when Microsoft trademarked "Windows".  Even though the computer screen was known as a window, the name was so well known to represent the software titled "Windows" that the trademark office allowed the trademark of "Windows" to Microsoft.

If you look on the interenet, you will find the Slider (pitching machine) on most of the largest sites in the country.  In additon, Dick's Sporting Goods for example carries the Slider pitching machine and also ran a national advertisement in November of 2006 promoting the Slider in their stores.

Since the Slider has become so well known, similiar to Microsoft's "Windows", I would ask the examing attorney to accept the trademark because the name is snynonimous with the pitching machine made by us.  Also, because the Slider Pitching Machine is so popular that there would be no confusion with other products that throw a slider pitch.    



FEE(S)
Fee(s) in the amount of $100 is being submitted.

SIGNATURE(S)
Petition/Response Signature
Signature: /William C. Lay/     Date: 08/16/2007
Signatory's Name: William C. Lay
Signatory's Position: President

The signatory has confirmed that he/she is not represented by either an authorized attorney or Canadian attorney/agent, and that he/she is either (1) the applicant or (2) a person(s) with legal authority to bind the applicant; and if an authorized U.S. attorney or Canadian attorney/agent previously represented him/her in this matter, either he/she has filed a signed revocation of power of attorney with the USPTO or the USPTO has granted the request of his/her prior representative to withdraw.

        
RAM Sale Number: 7052
RAM Accounting Date: 08/16/2007
        
Serial Number: 78913307
Internet Transmission Date: Thu Aug 16 13:01:48 EDT 2007
TEAS Stamp: USPTO/POA-XXX.XX.XXX.XX-2007081613014867
4078-78913307-3806546505943f1e4603c51224
49c3a9e71-CC-7052-20070816121055559198


TEAS Petition to Revive Abandon Applic [image/jpeg]


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed