SUV-CAM
Elmo Company, Limited
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 78903436 |
| Registration Number | 3292489 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
| Cancellation Code | 2 |
| Domestic Representative | Max Vern |
| Attorney Name | Max Vern |
| Attorney Docket Number | 80800/197 |
| Law Office Assigned | L40 |
| Employee Name | SPILS, CAROL A |
Timeline
| 2006-06-08 | Application Filed |
| 2007-07-09 | Amend to Register |
| 2007-09-11 | Trademark Registered |
| 2013-07-09 | Location: TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 |
| 2018-04-13 | Cancelled |
| 2018-04-13 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Elmo Company, Limited |
| Address | 6-14, Meizen-cho, Mizuho-ku Nagoya, Aichi JP |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | JP |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 9 |
| U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0091 | Portable video cameras, video disc players, [ video cassette recorders, ] digital video recorders |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2006-06-13 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | 2006-06-14 | 2 MPMK O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2006-11-09 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2006-11-19 | 4 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2006-11-19 | 5 GNRT F:First Action |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2007-04-25 | 6 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2007-05-17 | 7 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2007-05-17 | 8 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2007-05-17 | 9 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2007-06-07 | 10 CNFR R:Renewal |
| FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2007-06-07 | 11 GNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2007-07-09 | 12 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2007-07-10 | 13 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2007-07-10 | 14 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | 2007-08-05 | 15 CNTA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2007-08-06 | 16 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | 2007-09-11 | 17 R.SR A:Allowance for Publication |
| TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | 2013-06-21 | 18 ES8R I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | 2013-07-08 | 19 APRE A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | 2013-07-09 | 20 8.OK O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | 2013-07-09 | 21 NAS8 E:E-Mail |
| COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | 2016-09-11 | 22 REM2 E:E-Mail |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | 2018-04-13 | 23 CAEX O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 