Research |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Serial Number | 78862116 |
Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
Attorney Name | Philip R. Zender, Esq. |
Law Office Assigned | M70 |
Employee Name | MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIB |
2006-04-14 | Application Filed |
2007-09-27 | Abandon |
2008-03-10 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
2008-03-10 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | ![]() |
Address | 2761 Fruitland Avenue Vernon DE 90058 |
Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
Legal Entity State | DE |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
International Codes: | 18 |
U.S. Codes: | 001,002,003,022,041 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0181 | Handbags, purses, clutches, cosmetic bags sold empty, shoulder bags, brief cases, attaché cases, overnight bags, cosmetic cases sold empty, satchels, back packs, leather key chains, vanity cases sold empty, luggage and umbrellas |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2006-04-20 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2006-08-18 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2006-09-01 | 3 CNRT R:Renewal |
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2006-09-01 | 4 CNRT F:First Action |
ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | 2006-09-20 | 5 ASCK I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2006-10-03 | 6 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2006-10-03 | 7 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2007-03-01 | 8 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2007-03-01 | 9 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2007-03-02 | 10 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2007-03-26 | 11 CNFR R:Renewal |
FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2007-03-26 | 12 GNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | 2007-04-11 | 13 ASCK I:Incoming Correspondence |
ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | 2007-04-18 | 14 ASCK I:Incoming Correspondence |
ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | 2007-04-25 | 15 ASCK I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2007-06-26 | 16 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2007-07-10 | 17 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2007-06-26 | 18 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2007-07-10 | 19 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | 2007-08-13 | 20 CNCF S: |
ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | 2007-08-13 | 21 GECD O:Outgoing Correspondence |
NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | 2007-08-13 | 22 GEA1 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | 2008-03-10 | 23 ABN0 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | 2008-03-11 | 24 MAB0 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | 2013-02-20 | 25 ASCK I:Incoming Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.