LILI WATCHES
Lili Diamonds
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 78822544 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 3000: Illustration: Drawing or design which also includes word(s)/ letter(s)/number(s) |
| Domestic Representative | Jacobson Holman PLLC |
| Attorney Name | John Clarke Holman |
| Attorney Docket Number | T35796US0 |
| Law Office Assigned | M60 |
| Employee Name | EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLIN |
Timeline
| 2006-02-24 | Application Filed |
| 2010-06-08 | Abandon |
| 2010-07-08 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
| 2010-07-08 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Lili Diamonds |
| Address | The Diamond Exchange -- Maccabi Building , 1 Jabotinsky Street; Ramat Gan IL 52520 |
| Legal Entity Type | Partnership |
| Legal Entity State | IL |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Design Search Codes
| 010110 | Stars, three or more; Three or more stars |
| 010113 | Stars |
| 011714 | Maps of the world |
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 14 |
| U.S. Codes: | 002,027,028,050 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| D10000 | "WATCHES" |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2006-03-02 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | 2006-03-03 | 2 MDSC O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | 2006-05-17 | 3 PARI I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPLICANT AMENDMENT PRIOR TO EXAMINATION - ENTERED | 2006-05-17 | 4 AMPX O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2006-08-15 | 5 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2006-08-22 | 6 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2006-08-23 | 7 CNRT F:First Action |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2007-02-22 | 8 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2007-03-29 | 9 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2007-03-29 | 10 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2007-03-29 | 11 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | 2007-04-02 | 12 CNSL R:Renewal |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 2007-04-03 | 13 CNSL S: |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2007-06-05 | 14 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2007-10-17 | 15 RCSC S: |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2008-05-06 | 16 RCSC S: |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2008-11-06 | 17 RCSC S: |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2009-05-06 | 18 RCSC S: |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2009-11-06 | 19 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| LIE CHECKED SUSP - TO ATTY FOR ACTION | 2009-11-09 | 20 RCCK S: |
| SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | 2009-12-07 | 21 CNSI R:Renewal |
| INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | 2009-12-07 | 22 CNSI S: |
| ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2010-07-08 | 23 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2010-07-08 | 24 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 