To:College Park Industries, Inc. (IPDocket@h2law.com)
Subject:TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 78738897 - TRÉS - 60129-091
Sent:4/29/2006 3:48:26 PM
Sent As:ECOM113@USPTO.GOV
Attachments: Attachment - 1
Attachment - 2

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

 

    SERIAL NO:           78/738897

 

    APPLICANT:         College Park Industries, Inc.

 

 

        

*78738897*

    CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

  JOHN P. SEURYNCK

  HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS, P.C.

  39400 WOODWARD AVE STE 101

  BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304-5151

 

RETURN ADDRESS: 

Commissioner for Trademarks

P.O. Box 1451

Alexandria, VA 22313-1451

 

 

 

 

    MARK:       TRÉS

 

 

 

    CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:   60129-091

 

    CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS: 

 IPDocket@h2law.com

Please provide in all correspondence:

 

1.  Filing date, serial number, mark and

     applicant's name.

2.  Date of this Office Action.

3.  Examining Attorney's name and

     Law Office number.

4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

RESPONSE TIME LIMIT:  TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, THE OFFICE MUST RECEIVE A PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE MAILING OR E-MAILING DATE. 

 

MAILING/E-MAILING DATE INFORMATION:  If the mailing or e-mailing date of this Office action does not appear above, this information can be obtained by visiting the USPTO website at http://tarr.uspto.gov/, inserting the application serial number, and viewing the prosecution history for the mailing date of the most recently issued Office communication.

 

Serial Number  78/738897

 

The assigned examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application and determined the following:

 

PRIOR PENDING APPLICATION

Although the examining attorney has searched the Office records and has found no similar registered mark that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d), the examining attorney encloses information regarding pending Application Serial No. 76608718.  37 C.F.R. §2.83. 

 

There may be a likelihood of confusion between the applicant’s mark and the mark in the above noted application under Section 2(d) of the Act.  The filing date of the referenced application precedes the applicant’s filing date.  If the earlier‑filed application matures into a registration, the examining attorney may refuse registration under Section 2(d). 

 

If applicant believes that there is no potential conflict between this application and the earlier-filed applications, then applicant may present arguments relevant to the issue in a request to remove the application from suspension.  The election to file or not to file such a request at this time in no way limits applicant’s right to address this issue at a later point.

 

Action on this application will be suspended pending the disposition of Application Serial No. 76608718, upon receipt of the applicant’s response resolving the following.

 

 

IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS

In the identification, the applicant must use the common commercial names for the goods, be as complete and specific as possible and avoid the use of indefinite words and phrases.  If the applicant chooses to use indefinite terms, such as “devices,” and “units,” then those words must be followed by the word “namely” and the goods listed by their common commercial names.  TMEP §§1402.01 and 1402.03(a).

 

Therefore, applicant may amend the following wording, if accurate: “prosthetic devices, namely artificial foot and ankle limbs” in Class 10.

 

However, please note that, while an application may be amended to clarify or limit the identification, additions to the identification are not permitted.  37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Trademark Rule 2.71(a), 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a), restricts amendments to the identification of goods or services as follows, “The applicant may amend the application to clarify or limit, but not to broaden, the identification of goods and/or services.”  This rule applies to all applications.  Therefore, the applicant may not amend to include any goods or services that are not within the scope of goods or service set forth in the present identification.

 

The Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual sets out acceptable language for identifying goods and services of various types.  The listing is by no means exhaustive but is intended to serve as a guide to examining attorneys in acting on applications and to the public in preparing applications.  For assistance with identifying goods and/or services in trademark applications, please see the online searchable Manual of Acceptable Identifications of Goods and Services at http://tess2.uspto.gov/netahtml/tidm.html.

 

SIGNIFICANCE

Applicant must specify whether “TRES” has any significance in the trade or industry, or any meaning in a foreign language.  37 C.F.R. §2.61(b).

 

 

If applicant has any questions or needs assistance in responding, applicant is encouraged to telephone or email the assigned examining attorney.

 

 

USPTO

/kelly a choe/

Kelly A Choe

Trademark Attorney

Law Office 113

Telephone: 571. 272.9429

Response: www.uspto.gov/teas

 

 

HOW TO RESPOND TO THIS OFFICE ACTION:

 

STATUS OF APPLICATION: To check the status of your application, visit the Office’s Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) system at http://tarr.uspto.gov.

 

VIEW APPLICATION DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Documents in the electronic file for pending applications can be viewed and downloaded online at http://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal/tow.

 

GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION: For general information about trademarks, please visit the Office’s website at http://www.uspto.gov/main/trademarks.htm

 

FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY SPECIFIED ABOVE.