Offc Action Outgoing

CLARO

CLARO S.A.

Offc Action Outgoing

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

 

    SERIAL NO:           78/716760

 

    APPLICANT:         Telet S/A

 

 

        

*78716760*

    CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

  LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN

  ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB

  666 THIRD AVENUE

  NEW YORK, NY 10017-5621

 

RETURN ADDRESS: 

Commissioner for Trademarks

P.O. Box 1451

Alexandria, VA 22313-1451

 

 

 

 

    MARK:       CLARO

 

 

 

    CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:   871009

 

    CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS: 

 

Please provide in all correspondence:

 

1.  Filing date, serial number, mark and

     applicant's name.

2.  Date of this Office Action.

3.  Examining Attorney's name and

     Law Office number.

4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

RESPONSE TIME LIMIT:  TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, THE OFFICE MUST RECEIVE A PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE MAILING OR E-MAILING DATE. 

 

MAILING/E-MAILING DATE INFORMATION:  If the mailing or e-mailing date of this Office action does not appear above, this information can be obtained by visiting the USPTO website at http://tarr.gov.uspto.report/, inserting the application serial number, and viewing the prosecution history for the mailing date of the most recently issued Office communication.

 

Serial Number  78/716760

 

The assigned trademark examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application and has determined the following:

 

Search of Office Records

The Office records have been searched and no similar registered or pending mark has been found that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).  TMEP §704.02.

 

However, applicant must respond to the following issues.

 

Translation of Foreign Wording Required

Applicant must submit an English translation of the mark.  37 C.F.R. §2.61(b); TMEP §809.  The following translation statement is suggested:  “The English translation of CLARO is CLEAR.”  See Exhibit A.

 

Color Claim and Description Incomplete – Amendment Required

The color claim and color description do not list all the colors appearing in the drawing of the mark.  Applicant must submit a complete color claim and color description of the mark that reference all the colors appearing in the drawing of the mark.  37 C.F.R. §2.52(b)(1); TMEP §807.07(a)(ii).  Specifically, the color gray appears in the border of the red three-dimensional ball and must be claimed and described.

 

The following color claim and color description are suggested:  “The colors gray, red and white are claimed as a feature of the mark.  The color red appears in the three dimensional design of a ball containing the text “CLARO,” which appears in white.  Three short white lines appear above the “O” in “CLARO.”   The color white also appears in the from of two stylized representations of the reflection of light.  The color gray appears in the edges of the red ball.”  37 C.F.R. §§2.52(b) and (b)(1); TMEP §§807.07(a)(i) and (a)(ii).

 

Identification of Goods and Services

The wording “periphericals and accessories” in the identification of goods and services is unacceptable as indefinite.  Applicant must indicate the specific goods.  TMEP §§1402.01.  Applicant may adopt the following identification, if accurate:

 

Class 009: “telephone apparatus and telephone peripherals and accessories, namely {indicate specific goods, e.g. telephone headsets}.”

 

The wording “telecommunication services” in the identification of goods and services is unacceptable as indefinite.  Applicant must indicate the specific services provided.  TMEP §§1402.01.  Applicant may adopt the following identification, if accurate:

 

Class 009: “telecommunication services, namely {indicate specific services, e.g. telecommunication access services, call hunting, etc.}”

 

Please note that, while the identification of goods and services may be amended to clarify or limit the goods and services, adding to the goods and services or broadening the scope of the goods and services is not permitted.  37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Therefore, applicant may not amend the identification to include goods and services that are not within the scope of the goods and services set forth in the present identification.

 

For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and/or services in trademark applications, please see the online searchable Manual of Acceptable Identifications of Goods and Services at http://tess2.gov.uspto.report/netahtml/tidm.html.

 

Applicant May Proceed Solely on Intent-to-Use Basis

If applicant wishes to proceed relying on the applicant’s intent to use the mark in commerce under Trademark Act Section 1(b) as the sole basis for registration, with the claim of priority under Section 44(d), then applicant should so advise the trademark examining attorney.  TMEP §§806.02(f) and 806.04(b).  If applicant chooses to do so, this Office will approve the mark for publication without waiting for applicant to submit a copy of the foreign registration, once all other outstanding issues are resolved.  However, while the application may be approved for publication, the mark will not register until after an acceptable allegation of use has been filed.

 

If applicant does not indicate otherwise, this Office will presume that applicant wishes to rely on the foreign registration as an additional basis for registration.  Thus, the application will not be approved for publication until a copy of the foreign registration and, if appropriate, an English translation signed by the translator, have been filed.  TMEP §§1004.01 and 1004.01(b).

 

 

 

 

/Sean Crowley/

Trademark Attorney

Law Office 116

571.272.8851 (telephone)

571.273.8851 (fax)

 

 

 

HOW TO RESPOND TO THIS OFFICE ACTION:

  • ONLINE RESPONSE:  You may respond using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) Response to Office action form available on our website at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html.  If the Office action issued via e-mail, you must wait 72 hours after receipt of the Office action to respond via TEAS.  NOTE:  Do not respond by e-mail.  THE USPTO WILL NOT ACCEPT AN E-MAILED RESPONSE.
  • REGULAR MAIL RESPONSE:  To respond by regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing return address above, and include the serial number, law office number, and examining attorney’s name.  NOTE:  The filing date of the response will be the date of receipt in the Office, not the postmarked date.  To ensure your response is timely, use a certificate of mailing.  37 C.F.R. §2.197.

 

STATUS OF APPLICATION: To check the status of your application, visit the Office’s Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) system at http://tarr.uspto.gov.

 

VIEW APPLICATION DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Documents in the electronic file for pending applications can be viewed and downloaded online at http://portal.gov.uspto.report/external/portal/tow.

 

GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION: For general information about trademarks, please visit the Office’s website at http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm

 

FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY SPECIFIED ABOVE.

 

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed