Response to Office Action

POWER PACK

MATTEL, INC.

Response to Office Action

PTO Form 1957 (Rev 5/2006)
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp. 04/2009)

Response to Office Action


The table below presents the data as entered.

Input Field
Entered
SERIAL NUMBER 78635477
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED LAW OFFICE 110
MARK SECTION (no change)
ARGUMENT(S)

IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION

 

 

 

In re:                       Trademark Application of                                   )

                                Mattel, Inc.                                                            )

                                333 Continental Boulevard                                 )               Trademark Law Office:  110

                                El Segundo, California 90245-5012                    )                                                                              

Serial No.:              78/635477                                                               )               Examining Attorney:

Filing Date:            May 23, 2005                                                         )               Sara N. Thomas

Class:                     28                                                                            )

Mark:                      POWER PACK                                                    )

 

 

 

Commissioner for Trademarks

P.O. Box 1451

Alexandria, VA  22313-1451

 

 

Madam:

                This is in response to the Office Action mailed December 22, 2005.

               

RESPONSE

                The Examining Attorney has refused registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. Section 1052(d), because the Applicant's mark, when used on or in connection with the identified goods, so resembles the mark in U.S. Registration Number 2,066,491 POWER PAK as to be likely to cause confusion, to cause mistake, or to deceive.

                Applicant respectfully disagrees with the Examining Attorney's determination.  In testing for likelihood of confusion under Section 2(d), the court in In re E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973), cited factors relevant to the evaluation of whether or not source confusion is likely.

                Applying these factors to this subject issue, Applicant believes that any analysis balances in favor of Applicant.

                Applicant has narrowed the scope of the goods to better reflect Applicant's intended use and by doing so, has properly distinguished them from the goods associated with the cited registration.

                The Applicant asks the Examining Attorney to reconsider the requirement to disclaim the term "PACK".  The wording "POWER PACK" when viewed as a whole, creates a unitary impression upon the consumer, as the mark is both alliterative and incongruous.  Additionally, the registration for POWER PAK that has been cited against Applicant's mark does not disclaim the word "PAK".

                In view of the above, Applicant respectfully requests the Examining Attorney withdraw the refusal to register made under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. Section 1052(d) and to pass this application to publication.

                                                                                                Respectfully submitted,

GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (current)
INTERNATIONAL CLASS 028
DESCRIPTION TOYS, GAMES AND PLAYTHINGS
FILING BASIS Section 1(b)
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (proposed)
INTERNATIONAL CLASS 028
DESCRIPTION
TOYS, GAMES AND PLAYTHINGS, NAMELY, TOY VEHICLES AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR
FILING BASIS Section 1(b)
ADDITIONAL STATEMENTS SECTION
MISCELLANEOUS STATEMENT APPLICANT RESPONDS TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY'S ADDITIONAL INQUIRY BY SUPPLYING THE ATTACHED PHOTOGRAPH.
MISCELLANEOUS FILE NAME(S) \\TICRS\EXPORT5\IMAGEOUT5 \786\354\78635477\xml1\RO A0002.JPG
SIGNATURE SECTION
RESPONSE SIGNATURE /mcm/
SIGNATORY NAME MICHAEL MOORE
SIGNATORY POSITION SENIOR COUNSEL
SIGNATURE DATE 06/04/2006
FILING INFORMATION SECTION
SUBMIT DATE Mon Jun 05 11:14:53 EDT 2006
TEAS STAMP USPTO/ROA-XX.XXX.XXX.XX-2
0060605111454177051-78635
477-33238c4a618acbb52ea2f
c30a0ed9b6b14-N/A-N/A-200
60602135227794142



PTO Form 1957 (Rev 5/2006)
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp. 04/2009)

Response to Office Action


To the Commissioner for Trademarks:


Application serial no. 78635477 has been amended as follows:
Argument(s)
In response to the substantive refusal(s), please note the following:

IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION

 

 

 

In re:                       Trademark Application of                                   )

                                Mattel, Inc.                                                            )

                                333 Continental Boulevard                                 )               Trademark Law Office:  110

                                El Segundo, California 90245-5012                    )                                                                              

Serial No.:              78/635477                                                               )               Examining Attorney:

Filing Date:            May 23, 2005                                                         )               Sara N. Thomas

Class:                     28                                                                            )

Mark:                      POWER PACK                                                    )

 

 

 

Commissioner for Trademarks

P.O. Box 1451

Alexandria, VA  22313-1451

 

 

Madam:

                This is in response to the Office Action mailed December 22, 2005.

               

RESPONSE

                The Examining Attorney has refused registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. Section 1052(d), because the Applicant's mark, when used on or in connection with the identified goods, so resembles the mark in U.S. Registration Number 2,066,491 POWER PAK as to be likely to cause confusion, to cause mistake, or to deceive.

                Applicant respectfully disagrees with the Examining Attorney's determination.  In testing for likelihood of confusion under Section 2(d), the court in In re E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973), cited factors relevant to the evaluation of whether or not source confusion is likely.

                Applying these factors to this subject issue, Applicant believes that any analysis balances in favor of Applicant.

                Applicant has narrowed the scope of the goods to better reflect Applicant's intended use and by doing so, has properly distinguished them from the goods associated with the cited registration.

                The Applicant asks the Examining Attorney to reconsider the requirement to disclaim the term "PACK".  The wording "POWER PACK" when viewed as a whole, creates a unitary impression upon the consumer, as the mark is both alliterative and incongruous.  Additionally, the registration for POWER PAK that has been cited against Applicant's mark does not disclaim the word "PAK".

                In view of the above, Applicant respectfully requests the Examining Attorney withdraw the refusal to register made under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. Section 1052(d) and to pass this application to publication.

                                                                                                Respectfully submitted,



Classification and Listing of Goods/Services

Applicant hereby amends the following class of goods/services in the application as follows:
Current: Class 028 for TOYS, GAMES AND PLAYTHINGS
Original Filing Basis: 1(b).
Proposed: Class 028 for TOYS, GAMES AND PLAYTHINGS, NAMELY, TOY VEHICLES AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR

Additional Statements
APPLICANT RESPONDS TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY'S ADDITIONAL INQUIRY BY SUPPLYING THE ATTACHED PHOTOGRAPH.
Miscelleneous Statement-1

Response Signature

Signature: /mcm/     Date: 06/04/2006
Signatory's Name: MICHAEL MOORE
Signatory's Position: SENIOR COUNSEL
        
Serial Number: 78635477
Internet Transmission Date: Mon Jun 05 11:14:53 EDT 2006
TEAS Stamp: USPTO/ROA-XX.XXX.XXX.XX-2006060511145417
7051-78635477-33238c4a618acbb52ea2fc30a0
ed9b6b14-N/A-N/A-20060602135227794142


Response to Office Action [image/jpeg]


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed