UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

RESPONSE TIME LIMIT:  TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, THE OFFICE MUST RECEIVE A PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE MAILING OR E-MAILING DATE. 

 

MAILING/E-MAILING DATE INFORMATION:  If the mailing or e-mailing date of this Office action does not appear above, this information can be obtained by visiting the USPTO website at http://tarr.gov.uspto.report/, inserting the application serial number, and viewing the prosecution history for the mailing date of the most recently issued Office communication.

 

Serial Number  78/623200

 

 

This letter responds to the applicant's communication filed on 12/15/05.  In its response, the applicant (1) amended its classification, (2) deleted a claim of acquired distinctiveness, and (3) submitted a new drawing.  Numbers 1 and 2 are acceptable.  For the following reasons, the requirement for an acceptable drawing and/or color claim and description are maintained and CONTINUED.   In addition, the applicant must clarify whether GRAY is a feature of the mark.

Drawing

 

The proposed amendment of the drawing is unacceptable because it would materially alter the essence or character of the mark.  37 C.F.R. §2.72; TMEP §§807.14 et seq.  See In re Who? Vision Systems, Inc., 57 USPQ2d 1211 (TTAB 2000) (amendment from TACILESENSE to TACTILESENSE found to be material alteration); In re CTB Inc., 52 USPQ2d 1471 (TTAB 1999) (proposed amendment of “TURBO AND DESIGN” to typed word “TURBO” is material alteration); In re Meditech International Corp., 25 USPQ2d 1159, 1160 (TTAB 1990) (“[a] drawing consisting of a single blue star, as well as a drawing consisting of a number of blue stars, would both be considered material alterations vis-à-vis a drawing consisting of the typed words ‘DESIGN OF BLUE STAR’”); In re Wine Society of America Inc., 12 USPQ2d 1139 (TTAB 1989) (proposed amendment to replace typed drawing of “THE WINE SOCIETY OF AMERICA” with a special form drawing including those words with a crown design and a banner design bearing the words “IN VINO VERITAS” held to be a material alteration); In re Nationwide Industries Inc., 6 USPQ2d 1882 (TTAB 1988) (addition of house mark “SNAP” to product mark “RUST BUSTER” held a material alteration).

 

The amended drawing has been amended to GRAY and includes a square box.  It is unclear whether the amended drawing intended to include the square box and if the color gray is a feature of the mark.  Please note that if the color gray is intended to indicate shading or contrast only, then applicant must submit a statement that “the mark is not in color.”

 

The mark in a drawing cannot be amended if the change would materially alter the mark.  TMEP §807.14.  The Office determines whether a proposed amendment materially alters a mark by comparing the proposed amendment with the drawing of the mark filed with the original application.  37 C.F.R. §2.72; TMEP §807.14(c).

 

If republication of the amended mark would be necessary in order to provide proper notice to third parties for opposition purposes, then the mark has been materially altered and the amendment is not permitted.  In re Who? Vision Systems Inc., 57 USPQ2d 1211, 1218 (TTAB 2000).  “The modified mark must contain the essence of the original mark, and the new form must create the impression of being essentially the same mark.”  Visa International Service Association v. Life Code Systems, Inc., 220 USPQ 740, 743 (TTAB 1983).  “That is, the new and old forms of the mark must create essentially the same commercial impression.”  In re Nationwide Industries Inc., 6 USPQ2d 1882, 1885 (TTAB 1988).

 

With regards to the original drawing:

 

Applicant had submitted a color drawing and must clarify whether color is a feature of the proposed mark.  37 C.F.R. §2.52(b)(1); TMEP §807.07(b).

 

If color is a feature of the proposed mark, then applicant must submit (1) a statement that “the colors red, white, and black are claimed as a feature of the mark,” and (2) a separate description of where the colors appear in the mark, i.e., “the color red appears in the flame and in the lines  above and below the wording, the color white appears in the word, TIMBERLINE, and the color black appears in the rectangular box.”  Common color names should be used to describe the colors in the mark, e.g., red, yellow, blue.  TMEP §§807.07(a)(i) and (a)(ii).

 

If color is not a feature of the mark, then applicant must submit a substitute black and white drawing of the proposed mark to replace the color drawing of record.

 

DRAWING REQUIREMENTS:

 

The drawing must appear in black and white if color is not claimed as a feature of the mark, or in color if color is claimed as a feature of the mark.

 

Drawings must be made with a pen or by a process that will provide high definition when copied.  A photolithographic, printer’s proof copy, or other high quality reproduction of the mark may be used.  All lines must be clean, sharp and solid, and must not be fine or crowded.

 

The image must be no larger than 3.15 inches (8 cm) high by 3.15 inches (8cm) wide.

 

If reduction of the mark to the required size renders any details illegible, then applicant may insert a statement in the application to describe the mark and these details.

 

37 C.F.R. §§2.52(b); TMEP §§807.04 et seq.

 

If submitted on paper, the Office prefers that the drawing be depicted on a separate sheet of non-shiny, white paper that is 8 to 8.5 inches wide and 11 to 11.69 inches long (20.3 to 21.6 cm. wide and 27.9 to 29.7 cm. long).  One of the shorter sides of the sheet should be regarded as its top edge. In addition, the drawing should include the caption “DRAWING PAGE” at the top of the drawing beginning one-inch (2.5 cm) from the top edge.  37 C.F.R. §2.54; TMEP §§807.06 et seq.

 

To submit a special form drawing electronically, applicant must attach a digitized image of the mark to the submission.  The digitized image must be in .jpg format, formatted at no less than 300 dots per inch and no more than 350 dots per inch.  The Office recommends that the digitized image of the mark have a length and width of no smaller than 250 pixels and no larger than 944 pixels.  37 C.F.R. §2.53(c); TMEP §807.05(c).  All lines in the image must be clean, sharp and solid, and not fine or crowded, and produce a high quality image when copied. 

 

The Office strictly enforces these drawing requirements

 

If the applicant has any questions regarding this Office action, please telephone the assigned examining attorney. 

 

 

Lana H. Pham /lhp/

Attorney-Advisor

Law Office 115

(571) 272-9478

Lana.Pham@uspto.gov (informal)

www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html (response)

 

 

 

HOW TO RESPOND TO THIS OFFICE ACTION:

• ONLINE RESPONSE:  You may respond formally using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) Response to Office Action form (visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html and follow the instructions, but if the Office Action has been issued via email, you must wait 72 hours after receipt of the Office Action to respond via TEAS).
• REGULAR MAIL RESPONSE:  To respond by regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing return address above and include the serial number, law office number and examining attorney’s name in your response.

 

STATUS OF APPLICATION: To check the status of your application, visit the Office’s Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) system at http://tarr.uspto.gov.

 

VIEW APPLICATION DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Documents in the electronic file for pending applications can be viewed and downloaded online at http://portal.gov.uspto.report/external/portal/tow.

 

GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION: For general information about trademarks, please visit the Office’s website at http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm

 

FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY SPECIFIED ABOVE.