Examiners Amendment Priority

OI

Olympia International Holdings Limited

TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 78586968 - OI - 32024-215002

To: Olympia International Holdings Limited (trademarkdocket@venable.com)
Subject: TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 78586968 - OI - 32024-215002
Sent: 9/28/2005 9:20:17 PM
Sent As: ECOM114@USPTO.GOV
Attachments:

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

 

    SERIAL NO: 78/586968

 

    APPLICANT:         Olympia International Holdings Limited

 

 

*78586968*

 

 

    CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

MARK B.  HARRISON

VENABLE LLP

P.O.BOX 34385

WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998

 

RETURN ADDRESS: 

Commissioner for Trademarks

P.O. Box 1451

Alexandria, VA 22313-1451

 

 

 

 

    MARK:          OI

 

 

 

    CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:   32024-215002

 

    CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS: 

 trademarkdocket@venable.com

Please provide in all correspondence:

 

1.  Filing date, serial number, mark and

     applicant's name.

2.  Date of this Office Action.

3.  Examining Attorney's name and

     Law Office number.

4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.

 

 

EXAMINER’S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION

 

 

RESPONSE TIME LIMIT:  To avoid abandonment, the Office must receive a proper response to this Office action within 6 months of the mailing or e-mailing date.  If applicant responds to the issues below within two months of the above mailing or e-mailing date, this case will be given priority handling. 

 

OFFICE RECORDS SEARCH:  The Office records have been searched and no similar registered or pending mark has been found that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).  TMEP §704.02.

 

ADVISORY – AMENDMENTS TO GOODS/SERVICES:  If the identification of goods and/or services has been amended below, any future amendments must be in accordance with 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a) and TMEP §1402.07(e).

 

Serial Number 78/586968  Misc. Design (OI)

 

EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT

 

AMENDMENT(S) AUTHORIZED:  As authorized by the above applicant or attorney on September 28, 2005, the application is amended as noted below.  If applicant disagrees with or objects to any of the amendments below, please notify the undersigned trademark examining attorney immediately.  Otherwise, no response is necessary.  TMEP §707.   

 

I.  STANDARD CHARACTER CLAIM - Deleted:

 

The standard character claim is deleted from the record.

 

II.  MISCELLANEOUS STATEMENT:

 

The miscellaneous statement is deleted from the record.

 

 

PRIORITY ACTION

 

 

Applicant must respond to each refusal and/or requirement raised below.  If applicant responds to the issues below within two months of the above mailing or e-mailing date, this case will be given priority handling.  TMEP §§708.01 and 708.05.

 

I.  IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS/SERVICES - Indefinite in Part:

 

The applicant will adopt the following identification of goods and services, if accurate:

 

-         MP3 players; telephone transmitters; network communication equipment, namely, __________ (please specify, for example, communication hubs, computer hardware, etc.); carrier wave equipment, namely, __________ (please specify, for example, wave generator, wave sensor, etc.); global positioning systems; walkie talkies; telephone receivers; mobile telephones; full set wireless telephones; telephones, in International Class 9;

 

-         Radio broadcasting of family oriented programs; personal mobile radio service; general mobile radio service; voice over internet protocol, in International Class 38;  and

 

-         Family oriented radio entertainment production service, in International Class 41.

 

PLEASE NOTE:  The applicant is advised that the above suggestions may not be a complete listing of amended specifications available to the applicant, but are instead provided only as suggestions. Given the indefinite nature of the services, the examiner is unable to suggest a more comprehensive amended identification for the applicant’s consideration and possible adoption in responding to this Office Action.  It is the applicant's duty and prerogative to identify the goods and services. TMEP section 1402.01(d).

 

PTO ONLINE SEARCHING MANUAL:

 

For aid in selecting acceptable identifications of goods and services and determining proper classification, the searchable Manual of Acceptable Identifications of Goods and Services is available on the PTO website at www.uspto.gov.

 

Please note that, while an application may be amended to clarify or limit the identification, additions to the identification are not permitted.  37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Therefore, the applicant may not amend to include any goods or services that are not within the scope of the goods and services recited in the present identification.

 

II.  CLASSIFICATION OF GOODS/SERVICES:

 

The applicant will amend the application to classify the goods/services in International Classes 9, 38 & 41.

 

III.  ADDITIONAL CLASSES:

 

If the applicant prosecutes this application as a combined, or multiple‑class, application, the applicant must comply with each of the following:

 

(1)  The applicant must list the goods/services by international class with the classes listed in ascending numerical order (as listed above).  TMEP section 1113.01.

        

(2)  The applicant must submit a filing fee for each international class of goods/services not covered by the fee already paid.  37 C.F.R. Sections 2.6(a)(1) and 2.86(b); TMEP sections 810.01 and 1113.01.  The applicant has already submitted a filing fee for one class.

 

IV.  NEW DRAWING:

 

The drawing is not acceptable because it does not reproduce satisfactorily due to the inclusion of the background noise, which is not a part of the mark and must be deleted.  Accordingly, the applicant must submit a new drawing showing the mark clearly and conforming to 37 C.F.R. §§2.51 and 2.52.

 

The requirements for a special-form drawing are as follows:

 

·        The drawing must appear in black and white if color is not claimed as a feature of the mark, or in color if color is claimed as a feature of the mark.

 

·        Drawings must be typed or made with a pen or by a process that will provide high definition when copied.  A photolithographic, printer’s proof copy, or other high quality reproduction of the mark may be used.  All lines must be clean, sharp and solid, and must not be fine or crowded.

 

·        The image must be no larger than 3.15 inches (8 cm) high by 3.15 inches (8cm) wide.

 

·        If reduction of the mark to the required size renders any details illegible, then applicant may insert a statement in the application to describe the mark and these details.

 

37 C.F.R. §§2.52(b); See TMEP §§807.01(b) and 807.07(a).

 

-  Paper Submission:  If submitted on paper, the Office prefers that the drawing be depicted on a separate sheet of non-shiny, white paper that is 8 to 8.5 inches wide and 11 to 11.69 inches long (20.3 to 21.6 cm. wide and 27.9 to 29.7 cm. long).  One of the shorter sides of the sheet should be regarded as its top edge. In addition, the drawing should include the caption “DRAWING PAGE” at the top of the drawing beginning one-inch (2.5 cm) from the top edge.  37 C.F.R. §2.54.

 

-  Electronic Submission:  To submit a special form drawing electronically, applicant must attach a digitized image of the mark to the submission.  The Office will only accept an image in .jpg format.  The image must be formatted at no less than 300 dots per inch and no more than 350 dots per inch.  The Office recommends that the digitized image of the mark have a length and width of no smaller than 250 pixels and no larger than 944 pixels.  All lines in the image must be clean, sharp and solid, and not fine or crowded, and produce a high quality image when copied.  37 C.F.R. §2.53(c); 60 Fed. Reg. 59,809.

 

The Office strictly enforces these drawing requirements.

 

If the applicant has any questions or needs assistance in responding to this Office Action, please telephone the assigned examining attorney.

 

/KaranChhina/

Karanendra S. Chhina

Trademark Attorney

Law Office 114

(571) 272-9447

 

 

 

 

HOW TO RESPOND TO THIS OFFICE ACTION:

 

  • ONLINE RESPONSE:  You may respond formally using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) Response to Office Action form (visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html and follow the instructions, but if the Office Action has been issued via email, you must wait 72 hours after receipt of the Office Action to respond via TEAS).
  • REGULAR MAIL RESPONSE:  To respond by regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing return address above and include the serial number, law office number and examining attorney’s name in your response.

 

STATUS OF APPLICATION: To check the status of your application, visit the Office’s Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) system at http://tarr.uspto.gov.

 

VIEW APPLICATION DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Documents in the electronic file for pending applications can be viewed and downloaded online at http://portal.gov.uspto.report/external/portal/tow.

 

GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION: For general information about trademarks, please visit the Office’s website at http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed