IPS INNOVATIVE PROCESSING SOLUTIONS LLC
Innovative Processing Solutions, LLC
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 78575777 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 3000: Illustration: Drawing or design which also includes word(s)/ letter(s)/number(s) |
| Attorney Name | Julie A. Birdwell |
| Attorney Docket Number | 59837.m1 |
| Law Office Assigned | M60 |
| Employee Name | YARD, JOHN S |
Timeline
| 2004-11-15 | Date of First Use |
| 2005-02-26 | Application Filed |
| 2009-09-29 | Abandon |
| 2009-10-24 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
| 2009-10-24 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Innovative Processing Solutions, LLC |
| Address | 6125 Preservation Dr. Chattanooga NV 37416 |
| Legal Entity Type | Limited Liability Company |
| Legal Entity State | NV |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Design Search Codes
| 261709 | Bands, curved; Bars, curved; Curved line(s), band(s) or bar(s); Lines, curved |
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 9 |
| U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| D10000 | PROCESSING SOLUTIONS LLC |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2005-03-05 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2005-09-20 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2005-09-22 | 3 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2005-09-22 | 4 GNRT F:First Action |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2006-03-21 | 5 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2006-03-21 | 6 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2006-06-23 | 7 ACEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | 2006-07-21 | 8 CNSL R:Renewal |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | 2006-07-21 | 9 GNSL S: |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2007-02-02 | 10 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| LIE CHECKED SUSP - TO ATTY FOR ACTION | 2007-02-02 | 11 RCCK S: |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2007-02-21 | 12 RCSC S: |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2007-06-05 | 13 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2007-08-21 | 14 RCSC S: |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2007-08-21 | 15 RCSC S: |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2008-03-01 | 16 RCSC S: |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2008-03-01 | 17 RCSC S: |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2008-09-02 | 18 RCSC S: |
| LIE CHECKED SUSP - TO ATTY FOR ACTION | 2009-03-04 | 19 RCCK S: |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2009-03-28 | 20 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2009-03-28 | 21 GNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2009-03-28 | 22 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2009-10-24 | 23 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2009-10-26 | 24 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 