Suspension Letter

HESA

Astron Wireless Technologies, Inc.

TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 78524777 - HESA - 44605.34.1

To: Astron Wireless Technologies, Inc. (keyster@wcsr.com)
Subject: TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 78524777 - HESA - 44605.34.1
Sent: 11/8/05 1:55:18 PM
Sent As: ECOM106@USPTO.GOV
Attachments:

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

 

    SERIAL NO:           78/524777

 

    APPLICANT:         Astron Wireless Technologies, Inc.

 

     

 

*78524777*          

 

    CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

  Kathryn M. Eyster

  Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC

  PO Box 831

  Raleigh NC 27602

 

RETURN ADDRESS: 

Commissioner for Trademarks

P.O. Box 1451

Alexandria, VA 22313-1451

 

 

 

If no fees are enclosed, the address should include the words "Box Responses - No Fee."

    MARK:       HESA

 

 

 

    CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:  44605.34.1

 

    CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS: 

 keyster@wcsr.com 

Please provide in all correspondence:

 

1.  Filing date, serial number, mark and

     applicant's name.

2.  Date of this Office Action.

3.  Examining Attorney's name and

     Law Office number.

4.  Your telephone number and e-mail address.

 

 

Serial Number   78/524777      

 

NOTICE OF CONTINUED SUSPENSION

 

Action on this application remains suspended pending the disposition of:

 

            - Application Serial No(s). 79007433

 

Since applicant's effective filing date is subsequent to the effective filing date of the above-identified application(s), the latter, if and when it registers, may be cited against this application.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.83.  A copy of information relevant to this pending application(s) was sent previously.  The applicant may request that the application be removed from suspension by presenting arguments related to the potential conflict between the relevant applications or other arguments related to the ground for suspension.  The applicant's election to present or not to present arguments at this time will not affect the applicant's right to present arguments later.

 

Further, the applicant’s amended identification submitted on October 14, 2005, is not acceptable.  Applicant may revert to the prior identification, if so desired, since it seems applicant modified the identification in an attempt to show that there is no likelihood of confusion between its mark and the prior pending mark.  The prior acceptable identification was:  Antennas for wireless communications apparatus.    

 

For the applicant’s information, the modified identification would be acceptable if it read:  Antennas for military direction finding communications systems. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/Howard Friedman/

Attorney Advisor

Law Office 106

(571) 272-9319

(571) 273-9106 (Fax)

 

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed