ULTRALINK PRO
Red Chip Company Ltd.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 78494487 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
| Domestic Representative | Jennifer J. Baumann |
| Attorney Name | Jennifer J. Baumann |
| Attorney Docket Number | 12114-81 |
| Law Office Assigned | L40 |
| Employee Name | MACFARLANE, JAMES W |
Timeline
| 1999-06-02 | Date of First Use |
| 2004-10-05 | Application Filed |
| 2007-08-15 | Location: TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
| 2007-08-28 | Abandon |
| 2007-08-28 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Red Chip Company Ltd. |
| Address | Trident Chambers Wickhams Cay Road Town, Tortola VG |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | VG |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 9 |
| U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0091 | (BASED ON USE IN COMMERCE) Audio equipment, namely, signal splitters and signal mixers for use in connection with musical instruments and professional audio equipment; (BASED ON INTENT TO USE) Audio equipment, namely, wireless systems comprising audio transmitters for use with microphones and musical instruments |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2004-10-13 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2005-05-09 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | 2005-05-17 | 3 CNSL R:Renewal |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | 2005-05-17 | 4 GNSL F:First Action |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2005-11-21 | 5 RCSC S: |
| LIE CHECKED SUSP - TO ATTY FOR ACTION | 2006-06-02 | 6 RCCK S: |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2006-07-23 | 7 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2006-08-14 | 8 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2006-08-14 | 9 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2006-08-18 | 10 ACEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2006-12-20 | 11 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2006-12-20 | 12 GNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2007-06-25 | 13 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2007-07-09 | 14 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2007-07-18 | 15 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2007-07-18 | 16 ACEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2007-08-15 | 17 CNFR R:Renewal |
| FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2007-08-15 | 18 GNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | 2007-08-15 | 19 GNFN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | 2007-08-28 | 20 EXAR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | 2007-08-28 | 21 ABN1 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | 2007-08-28 | 22 MAB1 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 