DUAL OPTEK

Visiogen, Inc.

Application Filed: 2004-09-08

Trademark Application Details

Status

606

Dead/Abandoned

ABANDONED - NO STATEMENT OF USE FILED

Research	OneLook Acronym Finder
Serial Number	78480367
Mark Drawing Code	4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form
Attorney Name	Tirzah AbÃ© Lowe
Attorney Docket Number	VGEN.037T
Law Office Assigned	M80
Employee Name	BRODY, DANIEL S

Timeline

2004-09-08	Application Filed
2005-12-27	Published for Opposition
2008-09-22	Location: INTENT TO USE SECTION
2009-04-20	Abandon
2009-04-20	Status: Dead/Abandoned
2018-07-08	Transaction Date

Trademark Applicants & Owners

Owner:	Visiogen, Inc.
Address	2 Goodyear, Suite B Irvine DE 92618
Legal Entity Type	Corporation
Legal Entity State	DE

Documents

Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.

Attorney of Record

Tirzah AbÃ© Lowe
KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP
2040 Main Street, 14th Floor
Irvine CA 92614

Good, Services, and Codes

International Codes:	10
U.S. Codes:	026,039,044

Type Code	Type
GS0101	Ocular implants

Trademark Filing History

Description	Date	Event Coding
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM	2004-09-15	1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	2005-04-05	2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	2005-04-11	3 CNRT R:Renewal
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	2005-04-11	4 GNRT F:First Action
PAPER RECEIVED	2005-10-14	5 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	2005-10-14	6 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence
AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	2005-10-25	7 ACEC I:Incoming Correspondence
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	2005-10-28	8 CNSA P:
ASSIGNED TO LIE	2005-11-04	9 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication
LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	2005-11-09	10 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	2005-12-07	11 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	2005-12-27	12 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication
NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	2006-03-21	13 NOAM O:Outgoing Correspondence
TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	2006-09-19	14 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence
EXTENSION 1 FILED	2006-09-19	15 EXT1 S:
EXTENSION 1 GRANTED	2006-10-27	16 EX1G S:
TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	2007-03-09	17 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence
EXTENSION 2 FILED	2007-03-09	18 EXT2 S:
EXTENSION 2 GRANTED	2007-06-15	19 EX2G S:
TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	2007-09-20	20 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence
EXTENSION 3 FILED	2007-09-20	21 EXT3 S:
EXTENSION 3 GRANTED	2007-10-01	22 EX3G S:
TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	2008-03-20	23 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence
EXTENSION 4 FILED	2008-03-20	24 EXT4 S:
EXTENSION 4 GRANTED	2008-04-18	25 EX4G S:
TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED	2008-08-01	26 COAR I:Incoming Correspondence
APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED	2008-08-01	27 CHAN I:Incoming Correspondence
TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	2008-09-19	28 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence
CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL	2008-09-22	29 AITU A:Allowance for Publication
EXTENSION 5 FILED	2008-09-19	30 EXT5 S:
EXTENSION 5 GRANTED	2008-09-22	31 EX5G S:
ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	2009-04-20	32 ABN6 S:
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	2009-04-20	33 MAB6 O:Outgoing Correspondence

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.