To: | OMS Investments, Inc. (tmparalegal@owe.com) |
Subject: | TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 78465216 - SCOTTS - SCOTT 00381 |
Sent: | 2/15/05 11:17:06 AM |
Sent As: | ECOM111@USPTO.GOV |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 Attachment - 3 Attachment - 4 Attachment - 5 Attachment - 6 Attachment - 7 Attachment - 8 Attachment - 9 |
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
SERIAL NO: 78/465216
APPLICANT: OMS Investments, Inc.
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: |
RETURN ADDRESS: Commissioner for Trademarks P.O. Box 1451 Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
|
MARK: SCOTTS
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: SCOTT 00381
CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS: |
Please provide in all correspondence:
1. Filing date, serial number, mark and applicant's name. 2. Date of this Office Action. 3. Examining Attorney's name and Law Office number. 4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.
|
Serial Number 78/465216
The assigned examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application and determined the following.
The examining attorney has searched the Office records and has found no similar registered or pending mark which would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. Section 1052(d). TMEP section 1105.01.
The examining attorney refuses registration on the Principal Register because the mark is primarily merely a surname. Specifically, the term SCOTTS is primarily merely a surname. Trademark Act Section 2(e)(4), 15 U.S.C. Section 1052(e)(4); TMEP section 1211. The examining attorney must consider the primary significance of the mark to the purchasing public to determine whether a term is primarily merely a surname. In re Kahan & Weisz Jewelry Mfg. Corp., 508 F.2d 831, 184 USPQ 421 (CCPA 1975). Please see the attached evidence establishing the surname significance of the mark.
Although the examining attorney has refused registration, the applicant may respond to the refusal to register by submitting evidence and arguments in support of registration.
INFORMALITIES
If the applicant chooses to respond to the refusal to register, the applicant must also respond to the following issues.
The applicant may seek registration under the Trademark Act Section 2(f), 15 U.S.C. §1052(f), by claiming acquired distinctiveness through ownership of U.S. Registration 1761049. To do so, the applicant must provide a statement that the mark has become distinctive of the goods/services as evidenced by ownership of U.S. Registration 176109 on the Principal Register for the same mark for related goods or services. 37 C.F.R. §2.41(b); TMEP §§1212.04 et seq.
The identification of goods is unacceptable as indefinite. The applicant may adopt the following identification, if accurate:
“Protective work gloves; protective gloves for handling chemicals” in International Class 9.
“Gardening gloves” in International Class 21. TMEP section 804.
Please note that, while an application may be amended to clarify or limit the identification, additions to the identification are not permitted. 37 C.F.R. Section 2.71(a); TMEP section 804.09. Therefore, the applicant may not amend to include any goods that are not within the scope of goods set forth in the present identification.
For assistance with identifying goods and/or services in trademark applications, please see the online searchable Manual of Acceptable Identifications of Goods and Services at http://www.gov.uspto.report/web/offices/tac/doc/gsmanual/.
Effective January 31, 2005 and pursuant to the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005, Pub. L. 108-447, the following are the fees that will be charged for filing a trademark application:
(1) $325 per international class if filed electronically using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS); or
(2) $375 per international class if filed on paper
These fees will be charged not only when a new application is filed, but also when payments are made to add classes to an existing application. If such payments are submitted with a TEAS response, the fee will be $325 per class, and if such payments are made with a paper response, the fee will be $375 per class.
The new fee requirements will apply to any fees filed on or after January 31, 2005.
NOTICE: TRADEMARK OPERATION RELOCATION
The Trademark Operation has relocated to Alexandria, Virginia. Effective October 4, 2004, all Trademark-related paper mail (except documents sent to the Assignment Services Division for recordation, certain documents filed under the Madrid Protocol, and requests for copies of trademark documents) must be sent to:
Commissioner for Trademarks
P.O. Box 1451
Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
Applicants, attorneys and other Trademark customers are strongly encouraged to correspond with the USPTO online via the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html.
If the applicant has any questions or needs assistance in responding to this Office action, please telephone the assigned examining attorney.
/Zachary R Bello/
Zachary R Bello
Trademark Attorney
Law Office 111
(571) 272-9376
HOW TO RESPOND TO THIS OFFICE ACTION:
STATUS OF APPLICATION: To check the status of your application, visit the Office’s Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) system at http://tarr.uspto.gov.
VIEW APPLICATION DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Documents in the electronic file for pending applications can be viewed and downloaded online at http://portal.gov.uspto.report/external/portal/tow.
GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION: For general information about trademarks, please visit the Office’s website at http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm
FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY SPECIFIED ABOVE.