Research |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Serial Number | 78406695 |
Mark Drawing Code | 3000: Illustration: Drawing or design which also includes word(s)/ letter(s)/number(s) |
Domestic Representative | BROWDY AND NEIMARK, PLLC |
Attorney Name | Diana Michelle Sobo |
Attorney Docket Number | PARALLEL=1 |
Law Office Assigned | L60 |
Employee Name | SHIH, SALLY |
2004-04-22 | Application Filed |
2005-01-01 | Date of First Use |
2005-12-27 | Published for Opposition |
2006-12-12 | Abandon |
2007-01-09 | Location: TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
2007-01-09 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | ![]() |
Address | PO Box 262 Ashdod IL 77102 |
Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
Legal Entity State | IL |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
050125 | Cypress tree; Other trees or bushes; Willow tree |
260902 | Plain single line squares; Squares, plain single line |
International Codes: | 5 |
U.S. Codes: | 006,018,044,046,051,052 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
DM0000 | The mark consists of a fanciful flower design in a box, appearing above the wording "MAKHTESHIM AGAN" appearing above a black bar design, all to the left of the wording "PARALLEL". |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2004-05-05 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2004-11-16 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2004-11-29 | 3 CNRT R:Renewal |
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2004-11-29 | 4 GNRT F:First Action |
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2005-05-09 | 5 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2005-05-09 | 6 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2005-05-25 | 7 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2005-06-13 | 8 CNFR R:Renewal |
FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2005-06-13 | 9 GNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2005-10-13 | 10 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2005-10-13 | 11 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2005-10-24 | 12 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2005-10-25 | 13 CNSA P: |
ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2005-10-28 | 14 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2005-11-12 | 15 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2005-12-07 | 16 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2005-12-27 | 17 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2006-03-21 | 18 NOAM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | 2006-05-23 | 19 EISU I:Incoming Correspondence |
USE AMENDMENT FILED | 2006-05-23 | 20 IUAF S: |
STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2006-06-05 | 21 SUPC I:Incoming Correspondence |
SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | 2006-06-12 | 22 CNRT W: |
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2006-06-12 | 23 GNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2007-01-09 | 24 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2007-01-09 | 25 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.