Response to Office Action

ANDOVER

Holland USA, Inc.

Response to Office Action

PTO Form 1966 (Rev 9/2002)
OMB Control #0651-0050 (Exp. 04/30/2006)

Response to Office Action


The table below presents the data as entered.

Input Field
Entered
SERIAL NUMBER 78392152
MARK SECTION (no change)
ARGUMENT(S)

The Office Action cites a prior pending application as a potential conflict with the Applicant's mark.  Applicant is seeking registration of the mark ANDOVER for "pens" and the cited application is ANDOVER for use with "clocks."  The mark ANDOVER is registered for use with a wide variety of goods, including "kitchen cabintes and bathroom cabinets" (Reg. No. 2709264), "metal locks and door hardware" (Reg. No. 2805224), "vinyl siding" (Reg. No. 1491153), "woolen fabrics" (Reg. No. 0511789) and "building automation controls" (ANDOVER CONTROLS--Reg. No. 2868449). 

The differences between "pens" and "clocks" should be sufficient to avoid confusion, as pens and clocks are not at all the same types of goods.  Pens are used for writing with ink, while clocks are mechanical or electrical instruments for indicating time.  While both pens and clocks are sold in a variety of channels of trade, and may both be encountered in a general merchandise store, that does not lead to the conclusion that consumers would be likely to be confused as to the source of the products.  There is no other relationship between clocks and pens that would lead a consumer to assume that they emanate from the same source.

Many of the other marks registered for ANDOVER are all associated with building products, and would likely be found in a hardware store together (metal locks, vinyl siding, and kitchen cabinets), yet it strains belief that a consumer would be confused as to the source of the goods, particularly given the popularity of the mark ANDOVER on goods and services.

For the above reasons, the Applicant requests that the application be allowed to proceed and that the existence of this prior pending application not be grounds for a suspension, or refusal under Section 2(d).

GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (no change)
SIGNATURE SECTION
SIGNATURE /Jennifer C. Debrow/
SIGNATORY NAME Jennifer C. Debrow
SIGNATORY POSITION Attorney for Applicant
SIGNATORY DATE 12/07/2004
FILING INFORMATION SECTION
SUBMIT DATE Tue Dec 07 17:35:14 EST 2004
TEAS STAMP USPTO/OA-XXXXXXXX9-200412
07173514383211-78392152-2
00d06895cfe91b28a1cd223f6
286de473b-N-N-20041207173
438724256



PTO Form 1966 (Rev 9/2002)
OMB Control #0651-0050 (Exp. 04/30/2006)

Response to Office Action


To the Commissioner for Trademarks:

Application serial no. 78392152 is amended as follows:    
        
Argument(s)
In response to the substantive refusal(s), please note the following:

The Office Action cites a prior pending application as a potential conflict with the Applicant's mark.  Applicant is seeking registration of the mark ANDOVER for "pens" and the cited application is ANDOVER for use with "clocks."  The mark ANDOVER is registered for use with a wide variety of goods, including "kitchen cabintes and bathroom cabinets" (Reg. No. 2709264), "metal locks and door hardware" (Reg. No. 2805224), "vinyl siding" (Reg. No. 1491153), "woolen fabrics" (Reg. No. 0511789) and "building automation controls" (ANDOVER CONTROLS--Reg. No. 2868449). 

The differences between "pens" and "clocks" should be sufficient to avoid confusion, as pens and clocks are not at all the same types of goods.  Pens are used for writing with ink, while clocks are mechanical or electrical instruments for indicating time.  While both pens and clocks are sold in a variety of channels of trade, and may both be encountered in a general merchandise store, that does not lead to the conclusion that consumers would be likely to be confused as to the source of the products.  There is no other relationship between clocks and pens that would lead a consumer to assume that they emanate from the same source.

Many of the other marks registered for ANDOVER are all associated with building products, and would likely be found in a hardware store together (metal locks, vinyl siding, and kitchen cabinets), yet it strains belief that a consumer would be confused as to the source of the goods, particularly given the popularity of the mark ANDOVER on goods and services.

For the above reasons, the Applicant requests that the application be allowed to proceed and that the existence of this prior pending application not be grounds for a suspension, or refusal under Section 2(d).

        
        
Response Signature
        
Signature: /Jennifer C. Debrow/     Date: 12/07/2004
Signatory's Name: Jennifer C. Debrow
Signatory's Position: Attorney for Applicant
        
        
        
Serial Number: 78392152
Internet Transmission Date: Tue Dec 07 17:35:14 EST 2004
TEAS Stamp: USPTO/OA-XXXXXXXX9-20041207173514383211-
78392152-200d06895cfe91b28a1cd223f6286de
473b-N-N-20041207173438724256




uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed