FARM AND FIELD
Geoffrey, Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 78376058 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
| Attorney Name | Lawrence W. Greene |
| Law Office Assigned | M30 |
| Employee Name | GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL |
Timeline
| 2004-03-01 | Application Filed |
| 2005-01-18 | Published for Opposition |
| 2005-04-18 | Date of First Use |
| 2006-10-06 | Abandon |
| 2006-11-15 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
| 2006-11-15 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Geoffrey, Inc. |
| Address | One Geoffrey Way Wayne DE 07470 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | DE |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 28 |
| U.S. Codes: | 022,023,038,050 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| D10000 | "FARM" |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2004-03-17 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2004-09-18 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2004-09-20 | 3 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2004-09-21 | 4 CNRT F:First Action |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2004-10-08 | 5 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2004-10-08 | 6 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2004-11-01 | 7 ACEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2004-11-08 | 8 CNSA P: |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2004-11-19 | 9 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2004-11-19 | 10 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2004-12-29 | 11 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2005-01-18 | 12 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2005-04-12 | 13 NOAM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | 2005-04-28 | 14 EISU I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXTENSION 1 FILED | 2005-04-28 | 15 EXT1 S: |
| USE AMENDMENT FILED | 2005-04-28 | 16 IUAF S: |
| EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | 2005-05-12 | 17 EX1G S: |
| STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2005-05-12 | 18 SUPC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | 2005-08-17 | 19 CNRT W: |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2005-08-17 | 20 CNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2006-02-16 | 21 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2006-02-16 | 22 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2006-02-24 | 23 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | 2006-04-06 | 24 CNFR W: |
| FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 2006-04-07 | 25 CNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2006-11-15 | 26 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2006-11-16 | 27 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 