DINOMORPH
State of Oregon acting by and through the State Board of Higher Education on behalf of the University of Oregon
Application Filed: 2003-11-19
Trademark Application Details
ABANDONED - NO STATEMENT OF USE FILED
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 78330376 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
| Attorney Name | Richard J. Polley |
| Attorney Docket Number | 1505-66890-0 |
| Law Office Assigned | L70 |
| Employee Name | HAN, DAWN L |
Timeline
| 2003-11-19 | Application Filed |
| 2006-02-21 | Published for Opposition |
| 2007-08-20 | Location: INTENT TO USE SECTION |
| 2009-06-15 | Abandon |
| 2009-06-15 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  State of Oregon acting by and through the State Board of Higher Education on behalf of the University of Oregon |
| Entity Statement | STATE UNIVERSITY |
| Address | 1238 University of Oregon Eugene OR 97403 |
| Legal Entity Type | |
| Legal Entity State | OR |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 9 |
| U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
| International Codes: | 41 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,101,107 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0091 | software for creating, depicting, and interacting with three-dimensional scientifically-accurate representations of dinosaurs; video game software for creating, depicting, and interacting with three-dimensional scientifically-accurate representations of dinosaurs computer game programs for creating, depicting, and interacting with three-dimensional scientifically-accurate representations of dinosaurs; and video recordings depicting three-dimensional scientifically-accurate representations of dinosaurs |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2003-12-12 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2004-06-03 | 2 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2004-06-04 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2004-06-09 | 4 GNRT F:First Action |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2004-12-13 | 5 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2004-12-13 | 6 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2005-01-03 | 7 ACEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2005-01-30 | 8 CNFR R:Renewal |
| FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2005-01-30 | 9 GNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | 2005-08-01 | 10 EXAF T:TTAB Proceeding |
| JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | 2005-08-01 | 11 JURT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | 2005-08-01 | 12 EXPI T:TTAB Proceeding |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2005-08-04 | 13 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | 2005-09-05 | 14 CNCF S: |
| ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | 2005-09-05 | 15 GECD O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2005-11-21 | 16 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | 2005-12-02 | 17 JURT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2005-11-21 | 18 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2005-12-03 | 19 ACEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | 2006-01-04 | 20 CNEA R:Renewal |
| EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | 2006-01-04 | 21 GNEA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2006-01-04 | 22 CNSA P: |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2006-01-06 | 23 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2006-01-07 | 24 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2006-02-01 | 25 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2006-02-14 | 26 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2006-02-21 | 27 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2006-05-16 | 28 NOAM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2006-11-16 | 29 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXTENSION 1 FILED | 2006-11-16 | 30 EXT1 S: |
| EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | 2007-01-10 | 31 EX1G S: |
| EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | 2007-02-19 | 32 EXPT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2007-05-16 | 33 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXTENSION 2 FILED | 2007-05-16 | 34 EXT2 S: |
| EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | 2007-08-30 | 35 EX2G S: |
| TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2007-11-16 | 36 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXTENSION 3 FILED | 2007-11-16 | 37 EXT3 S: |
| EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | 2007-11-16 | 38 EX3G S: |
| TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2008-05-09 | 39 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXTENSION 4 FILED | 2008-05-09 | 40 EXT4 S: |
| EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | 2008-05-09 | 41 EX4G S: |
| TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2008-10-28 | 42 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXTENSION 5 FILED | 2008-10-28 | 43 EXT5 S: |
| EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | 2008-10-28 | 44 EX5G S: |
| ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2009-06-15 | 45 ABN6 S: |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2009-06-15 | 46 MAB6 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 