To: | The Hoover Company (Tkingsbury@hoover.com) |
Subject: | TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 78323939 - HOOVER - N/A |
Sent: | 5/26/04 1:58:42 PM |
Sent As: | ECom113 |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 |
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
SERIAL NO: 78/323939
APPLICANT: The Hoover Company
|
*78323939* |
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: Thomas R. Kingsbury The Hoover Company 101 East Maple Street North Canton, OH 44720
|
RETURN ADDRESS: Commissioner for Trademarks 2900 Crystal Drive Arlington, VA 22202-3514
|
MARK: HOOVER
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: N/A
CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS: Tkingsbury@hoover.com |
Please provide in all correspondence:
1. Filing date, serial number, mark and applicant's name. 2. Date of this Office Action. 3. Examining Attorney's name and Law Office number. 4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.
|
Serial Number 78/323939
The assigned examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application and determined the following.
Registration is refused because the proposed mark is primarily merely a surname. Trademark Act Section 2(e)(4), 15 U.S.C. §1052(e)(4); TMEP §§1211 et seq. The primary significance of the mark to the purchasing public determines whether a term is primarily merely a surname. In re Etablissements Darty et Fils, 759 F.2d 15, 225 USPQ 652, 653 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Kahan & Weisz Jewelry Mfg. Corp., 508 F.2d 831, 184 USPQ 421 (C.C.P.A. 1975).
Please see the attached evidence from the Social Security Death Index, establishing the surname significance of the surname Hoover. This evidence shows the proposed mark appearing some 17,000 times as a surname in a nationwide directory of benefits recipients.
Applicant may register a surname as a trademark under Trademark Act Section 2(f), 15 U.S.C. §1052(f), by establishing acquired distinctiveness in any one of the following three ways:
(1) submitting a claim of ownership of one or more prior registrations on the Principal Register for a mark that is the same as the mark in this application for the same or related goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §2.41(b); TMEP §§1212.04 et seq.
(2) submitting a statement that the mark has become distinctive of applicant's goods and/or services by reason of substantially exclusive and continuous use in commerce by the applicant for the five years preceding the date of the statement. Applicant must verify this statement with a notarized affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20. 37 C.F.R. §2.41(b); TMEP §§1212.05 et seq.
(3) submitting actual evidence of acquired distinctiveness. 37 C.F.R. §2.41(a); TMEP §§1212.06 et seq.
TMEP §§1211 and 1212.02(a).
The examining attorney has searched the Office records and has found no similar registered or pending mark which would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. Section 1052(d). TMEP section 1105.01.
How to respond to this Office Action:
To respond formally using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html and follow the instructions.
To respond formally via regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing Return Address listed above and include the serial number, law office and examining attorney’s name on the upper right corner of each page of your response.
FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY.
John T. Lincoski /JTL/
Trademark Attorney
Law Office 113
(703)308-9113 ext. 286
John.Lincoski@USPTO.GOV