VECTOR ACCESS TECHNOLOGY
Vertelink Corporation
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 78304641 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Attorney Name | Steven J. Nataupsky |
| Attorney Docket Number | VLINK.032T |
| Law Office Assigned | L40 |
| Employee Name | COLLIER, DAVID E |
Timeline
| 2003-09-24 | Application Filed |
| 2007-03-12 | Abandon |
| 2007-03-12 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2007-03-13 | Location: TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Vertelink Corporation |
| Address | Suite 206 30 Hughes Irvine CA 92618 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | CA |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 10 |
| U.S. Codes: | 026,039,044 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0101 | Medical devices, namely, portable alignment devices that hook onto screws implanted into spines for subcutaneously positioning guide wires through bone anchors, hooks, guide wires, screws, anchors, implants and surgical instruments |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2004-04-23 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2004-05-10 | 2 GNRT F:First Action |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2004-11-09 | 3 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2004-11-09 | 4 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2004-11-18 | 5 ACEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | 2004-12-14 | 6 CNSL R:Renewal |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | 2004-12-14 | 7 GNSL S: |
| LIE CHECKED SUSP - TO ATTY FOR ACTION | 2005-07-11 | 8 RCCK S: |
| FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2005-08-01 | 9 CNFR R:Renewal |
| FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2005-08-01 | 10 GNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | 2006-02-01 | 11 EXAF T:TTAB Proceeding |
| JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | 2006-02-01 | 12 JURT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | 2006-02-01 | 13 EXPI T:TTAB Proceeding |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2006-02-01 | 14 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | 2006-02-09 | 15 ATRQ I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2006-02-17 | 16 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | 2006-03-23 | 17 CNCF S: |
| ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | 2006-03-23 | 18 GECD O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | 2006-06-06 | 19 JURT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | 2006-07-25 | 20 CNES R:Renewal |
| EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | 2006-07-25 | 21 GNES O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | 2006-12-12 | 22 EXPA T:TTAB Proceeding |
| EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | 2007-03-12 | 23 EXPT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | 2007-03-12 | 24 ABN3 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | 2007-03-13 | 25 MAB3 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 