PTO Form 1966 (Rev 9/2002) |
OMB Control #0651-0050 (Exp. 04/30/2006) |
Input Field |
Entered |
SERIAL NUMBER | 78270003 |
MARK SECTION (no change) | |
ARGUMENT(S) | |
LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION The Examining Attorney has refused registration of the Applicant's mark under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act on the basis of Reg. No. 2408454 owned by Leopard Communications. However, no consumer confusion is likely. The Applicant, Apple Computer, Inc. ("Apple"), originally applied for registration of the mark LEOPARD for a broad recitation of goods, covering all types of computer hardware and software. However, in this office action response, Apple has limited its recitation of goods to "computer operating system software." This recitation is extremely narrow. Furthermore, this product can only be used with the Apple's computers, thus eliminating any possibility of confusion related to the source of the product. After this limitation of goods, it is clear that there is no overlap between Apple's goods and Registrant's services. The Registrant's services are limited to the following design services: Graphic art and multimedia design services for others; computer services, namely, designing web sites for others; developing computerized information databases for others; and computer systems integration services, in Intl. Class 42. None of these services are implicated by Apple's operating system software. Apple's operating system software is used solely to operate Apple's computer hardware and to run other computer programs. Operating system software performs basic tasks, such as recognizing input from keyboards, sending output to monitors, keeping track of files and directories on the hard drive, and controlling peripheral devices such as disk drives and printers. As such, this product is wholly unrelated to the Registrant's graphic art , multimedia, and website design services. According to its website, the Registrant is an advertising agency. See www.leopard.com. By contrast, Apple is a computer company. Registrant's customers are sophisticated purchasers - companies in need of advertising agency services. By contrast, Apple's purchasers are the general public, specifically, individuals who own Apple computers. Apple's LEOPARD product will be sold by Apple and by authorized Apple dealers. By contrast, Registrant's advertising agency services are provided by the Registrant to corporate clients on an individual basis. The USPTO has permitted numerous unrelated third parties to register LEOPARD marks. Therefore, the scope of protection accorded to each party is relatively narrow in scope. There are over 30 registrations and approved applications for LEOPARD marks, several of which are in Class 9 (Apple's class). Indeed the USPTO has previously approved two applications for LEOPARD marks for software, despite the cited registration: Ser. No. 78149734 for the mark LEOPARD LOGIC for software for integrated circuit design, and Ser. No. 76512923 for the mark LORD LEOPARD for gaming software. In view of the foregoing, Apple should be permitted to register its LEOPARD mark for its computer operating system software. In view of the coexistence of numerous LEOPARD marks on the Register, as well as the differences in Apple's product and the Registrant's services (and associated differences in the consumers, channels of distribution, etc.), there is no likelihood of confusion and Apple respectfully requests that the Examining Attorney withdraw the Section 2(d) refusal. PRIOR PENDING APPLICATIONS The Examining Attorney enclosed information regarding pending Application Serial Nos. 78266033, 78149734, and 76454489, on the grounds that there may be a likelihood of confusion between the marks therein and Apple's mark. However, no confusion is likely. As noted above, Apple has now drastically limited its recitation of goods to "computer operating system software." Accordingly, there is no overlap between Apple's goods and the goods listed in cited applications: Application Serial No. 76454489 is limited to "printing apparatus" Application Serial No. 78149734 is limited to "software for designing integrated circuits" Application Serial No. 78266033 is limited to "computer software for the management, distribution, and measurement of electronic and printed marketing, communications and sales support materials, and hosted software, accessible by computers via the Internet or by wireless communication" None of the foregoing products is in any way related to computer operating system software. Furthermore, Apple's LEOPARD operating system software can only be used with the Apple's computers, thus eliminating any possibility of confusion related to source. In view of the foregoing, the Apple respectfully requests that the Examining Attorney approve this application for publication. |
|
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (current) | |
INTERNATIONAL CLASS | 009 |
DESCRIPTION | |
computers; computer software; computer operating system software | |
FILING BASIS | Section 1(b) |
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (proposed) | |
INTERNATIONAL CLASS | 009 |
DESCRIPTION | computer operating system software |
FILING BASIS | Section 1(b) |
ADDITIONAL STATEMENTS SECTION | |
MISCELLANEOUS STATEMENT | The Examining Attorney states that the applicant's address does not supply a proper zip code; however, according to TESS records, the proper zip code has been entered. In any event, the proper zip code is 95014. |
SIGNATURE SECTION | |
SIGNATURE | /Susan Smith/ |
SIGNATORY NAME | Susan A. Smith |
SIGNATORY POSITION | Attorney for Applicant |
SIGNATORY DATE | 05/19/2004 |
FILING INFORMATION SECTION | |
SUBMIT DATE | Wed May 19 19:45:34 EDT 2004 |
TEAS STAMP | USPTO/OA-XXXXXXXXXX-20040 519194534029201-78270003- 200c3a2b6bbea7c5cfa8791aa 3add9271-N-N-200405191943 40995028 |
PTO Form 1966 (Rev 9/2002) |
OMB Control #0651-0050 (Exp. 04/30/2006) |
Application serial no. 78270003 is amended as follows: | |
Argument(s) | |
In response to the substantive refusal(s), please note the following: | |
LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION The Examining Attorney has refused registration of the Applicant's mark under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act on the basis of Reg. No. 2408454 owned by Leopard Communications. However, no consumer confusion is likely. The Applicant, Apple Computer, Inc. ("Apple"), originally applied for registration of the mark LEOPARD for a broad recitation of goods, covering all types of computer hardware and software. However, in this office action response, Apple has limited its recitation of goods to "computer operating system software." This recitation is extremely narrow. Furthermore, this product can only be used with the Apple's computers, thus eliminating any possibility of confusion related to the source of the product. After this limitation of goods, it is clear that there is no overlap between Apple's goods and Registrant's services. The Registrant's services are limited to the following design services: Graphic art and multimedia design services for others; computer services, namely, designing web sites for others; developing computerized information databases for others; and computer systems integration services, in Intl. Class 42. None of these services are implicated by Apple's operating system software. Apple's operating system software is used solely to operate Apple's computer hardware and to run other computer programs. Operating system software performs basic tasks, such as recognizing input from keyboards, sending output to monitors, keeping track of files and directories on the hard drive, and controlling peripheral devices such as disk drives and printers. As such, this product is wholly unrelated to the Registrant's graphic art , multimedia, and website design services. According to its website, the Registrant is an advertising agency. See www.leopard.com. By contrast, Apple is a computer company. Registrant's customers are sophisticated purchasers - companies in need of advertising agency services. By contrast, Apple's purchasers are the general public, specifically, individuals who own Apple computers. Apple's LEOPARD product will be sold by Apple and by authorized Apple dealers. By contrast, Registrant's advertising agency services are provided by the Registrant to corporate clients on an individual basis. The USPTO has permitted numerous unrelated third parties to register LEOPARD marks. Therefore, the scope of protection accorded to each party is relatively narrow in scope. There are over 30 registrations and approved applications for LEOPARD marks, several of which are in Class 9 (Apple's class). Indeed the USPTO has previously approved two applications for LEOPARD marks for software, despite the cited registration: Ser. No. 78149734 for the mark LEOPARD LOGIC for software for integrated circuit design, and Ser. No. 76512923 for the mark LORD LEOPARD for gaming software. In view of the foregoing, Apple should be permitted to register its LEOPARD mark for its computer operating system software. In view of the coexistence of numerous LEOPARD marks on the Register, as well as the differences in Apple's product and the Registrant's services (and associated differences in the consumers, channels of distribution, etc.), there is no likelihood of confusion and Apple respectfully requests that the Examining Attorney withdraw the Section 2(d) refusal. PRIOR PENDING APPLICATIONS The Examining Attorney enclosed information regarding pending Application Serial Nos. 78266033, 78149734, and 76454489, on the grounds that there may be a likelihood of confusion between the marks therein and Apple's mark. However, no confusion is likely. As noted above, Apple has now drastically limited its recitation of goods to "computer operating system software." Accordingly, there is no overlap between Apple's goods and the goods listed in cited applications: Application Serial No. 76454489 is limited to "printing apparatus" Application Serial No. 78149734 is limited to "software for designing integrated circuits" Application Serial No. 78266033 is limited to "computer software for the management, distribution, and measurement of electronic and printed marketing, communications and sales support materials, and hosted software, accessible by computers via the Internet or by wireless communication" None of the foregoing products is in any way related to computer operating system software. Furthermore, Apple's LEOPARD operating system software can only be used with the Apple's computers, thus eliminating any possibility of confusion related to source. In view of the foregoing, the Apple respectfully requests that the Examining Attorney approve this application for publication. |
|
Classification and Listing of Goods/Services | |
Applicant hereby amends the following class of goods/services in the application as follows: | |
Current: Class 009 for computers; computer software; computer operating system software | |
Original Filing Basis: 1(b). | |
Proposed: Class 009 for computer operating system software | |
Additional Statements | |
The Examining Attorney states that the applicant's address does not supply a proper zip code; however, according to TESS records, the proper zip code has been entered. In any event, the proper zip code is 95014. | |
Response Signature | |
Signature: /Susan Smith/ Date: 05/19/2004 | |
Signatory's Name: Susan A. Smith | |
Signatory's Position: Attorney for Applicant | |
Serial Number: 78270003 | |
Internet Transmission Date: Wed May 19 19:45:34 EDT 2004 | |
TEAS Stamp: USPTO/OA-XXXXXXXXXX-20040519194534029201 -78270003-200c3a2b6bbea7c5cfa8791aa3add9 271-N-N-20040519194340995028 |