MAIN ST. BISTRO
Reser's Fine Foods, Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 78253564 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Attorney Name | Michael L. Lovitz, Esq. |
| Attorney Docket Number | 21852-21 |
| Law Office Assigned | M10 |
| Employee Name | CAPSHAW, DANIEL |
Timeline
| 2003-05-23 | Application Filed |
| 2007-01-31 | Abandon |
| 2007-01-31 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2007-02-19 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Reser's Fine Foods, Inc. |
| Address | 15570 S.W. Jenkins Road Beaverton OR 97006 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | OR |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 29 |
| U.S. Codes: | 046 |
| International Codes: | 30 |
| U.S. Codes: | 046 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0291 | Refrigerated meal kits containing packages of meatballs, meatloaf, or other prepared meat products, and a separate package of mashed potatoes or macaroni and cheese sold to retail grocery stores; refrigerated prepared side dishes consisting primarily of potato sold to retail grocery stores |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2003-11-24 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2003-12-08 | 2 GNRT F:First Action |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2004-06-08 | 3 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2004-06-08 | 4 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | 2004-07-14 | 5 GNSL S: |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2005-01-27 | 6 RCSC S: |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2005-08-19 | 7 RCSC S: |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2006-01-26 | 8 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2006-01-26 | 9 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2006-02-02 | 10 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2006-02-21 | 11 CNFR R:Renewal |
| FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2006-02-21 | 12 GNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2006-04-25 | 13 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2006-04-25 | 14 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2006-05-12 | 15 ACEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | 2006-06-03 | 16 CNCF S: |
| ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | 2006-06-03 | 17 GECD O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | 2006-08-16 | 18 EXAF T:TTAB Proceeding |
| EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | 2006-08-16 | 19 EXPI T:TTAB Proceeding |
| EXPARTE APPEAL DSMSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | 2006-12-08 | 20 EXFB T:TTAB Proceeding |
| EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | 2007-01-31 | 21 EXPT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | 2007-01-31 | 22 ABN3 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | 2007-02-20 | 23 MAB3 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 