Research |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Serial Number | 78240383 |
Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
Attorney Name | Kent E. Baldauf, Jr., Registration No. 36,082 |
Attorney Docket Number | 2966-030685 |
Law Office Assigned | L40 |
Employee Name | ESTRADA, LINDA M |
2003-04-22 | Application Filed |
2006-08-17 | Abandon |
2006-08-17 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2006-11-20 | Location: TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | ![]() |
Address | 3806 Cross Creek Road, Unit F Malibu DE 90265 |
Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
Legal Entity State | DE |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
International Codes: | 9 |
U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0091 | Computer programs, namely an interactive natural language processing knowledge base used to build and customize interactive conversational mechanisms which assist, answer questions and provide information to users of web sites, for use in real-time Internet relay communications platforms |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2003-10-30 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2003-11-07 | 2 GNRT F:First Action |
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2004-05-06 | 3 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2004-05-06 | 4 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2004-06-12 | 5 GNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2005-01-21 | 6 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2005-01-21 | 7 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2005-03-02 | 8 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | 2005-03-02 | 9 PETR I:Incoming Correspondence |
PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | 2005-03-02 | 10 PETR I:Incoming Correspondence |
PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | 2005-04-25 | 11 PETG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2005-05-03 | 12 CNRT R:Renewal |
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2005-05-03 | 13 GNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | 2005-10-21 | 14 EXAF T:TTAB Proceeding |
JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | 2005-10-27 | 15 JURT T:TTAB Proceeding |
EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | 2005-10-27 | 16 EXPI T:TTAB Proceeding |
ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | 2005-11-17 | 17 CNCF S: |
ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | 2005-11-17 | 18 GECD O:Outgoing Correspondence |
JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | 2006-02-02 | 19 JURT T:TTAB Proceeding |
EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | 2006-03-27 | 20 CNES R:Renewal |
EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | 2006-03-27 | 21 GNES O:Outgoing Correspondence |
EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | 2006-08-17 | 22 EXPA T:TTAB Proceeding |
EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | 2006-11-01 | 23 EXPT T:TTAB Proceeding |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2006-11-20 | 24 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | 2006-08-17 | 25 ABN3 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | 2006-11-21 | 26 MAB3 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.