EROZ-ONE
Megasol Cosmetic GmbH
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 78225029 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Domestic Representative | David Toren |
| Attorney Name | David Toren |
| Attorney Docket Number | DT-6470 |
| Law Office Assigned | M30 |
| Employee Name | BALDWIN, SCOTT |
Timeline
| 2003-03-13 | Application Filed |
| 2004-06-01 | Published for Opposition |
| 2005-04-19 | Abandon |
| 2005-04-19 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2005-08-23 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - DOCKET CLERK |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Megasol Cosmetic GmbH |
| Address | Jean-Monnet-Strasse 6 Foehren DE 54343 |
| Legal Entity Type | Limited Liability Joint Stock |
| Legal Entity State | DE |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 3 |
| U.S. Codes: | 001,004,006,050,051,052 |
| International Codes: | 5 |
| U.S. Codes: | 006,018,044,046,051,052 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0031 | Perfumes, essential oils for personal use, products for body and beauty care, namely, creams, facial mask paste, non-medicated skin moisturizing ointments, lotions, sun screen preparations, tanning lotions, soaps, massage oils |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2003-08-14 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2003-08-18 | 2 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2003-08-19 | 3 CNRT F:First Action |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2003-10-06 | 4 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FAX RECEIVED | 2004-01-12 | 5 FAXX I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2003-10-06 | 6 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2004-03-16 | 7 CNSA P: |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2004-05-12 | 8 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2004-06-01 | 9 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | 2004-06-21 | 10 ETOF T:TTAB Proceeding |
| OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | 2004-07-16 | 11 OP.I T:TTAB Proceeding |
| OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | 2004-08-05 | 12 OP.I T:TTAB Proceeding |
| PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | 2004-09-14 | 13 PCRC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | 2005-01-27 | 14 OP.D T:TTAB Proceeding |
| OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | 2005-01-27 | 15 OP.T T:TTAB Proceeding |
| PETITION INQUIRY LETTER MAILED | 2005-02-17 | 16 PILM I:Incoming Correspondence |
| OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | 2005-04-19 | 17 OP.S T:TTAB Proceeding |
| OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | 2005-04-19 | 18 OP.T T:TTAB Proceeding |
| ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | 2005-04-19 | 19 ABN4 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | 2005-04-19 | 20 MAB4 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | 2005-05-05 | 21 PC.D T:TTAB Proceeding |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2005-08-05 | 22 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2006-07-06 | 23 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 