To: | Rokonet Electronics Ltd. (pto@steinbergraskin.com) |
Subject: | TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 78210447 - IWISE - 671.1024 |
Sent: | 8/3/03 9:53:17 AM |
Sent As: | ECom102 |
Attachments: |
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
SERIAL NO: 78/210447
APPLICANT: Rokonet Electronics Ltd.
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: Martin G. Raskin Steinberg & Raskin, P.C. 1140 Avenue of the Americas, 15th Floor New York NY USA 10036-5803
|
RETURN ADDRESS: Commissioner for Trademarks 2900 Crystal Drive Arlington, VA 22202-3514 ecom102@uspto.gov
|
MARK: IWISE
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: 671.1024
CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS: pto@steinbergraskin.com |
Please provide in all correspondence:
1. Filing date, serial number, mark and applicant's name. 2. Date of this Office Action. 3. Examining Attorney's name and Law Office number. 4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.
|
Serial Number 78/210447
The assigned examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application and determined the following.
Search Results
The examining attorney has searched the Office records and has found no similar registered or pending mark which would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d). TMEP §704.02.
The application must be signed, and verified or supported by a declaration under 37 C.F.R. Section 2.20. 37 C.F.R. Section 2.33. No signed verification or declaration was provided. Therefore, the applicant must provide a signed verification or signed declaration attesting to the facts set forth in the application.
For the applicant’s convenience, the following is a properly worded declaration with supporting statement.
The mark is in use in commerce and was in use in commerce on or in connection with the goods or services listed in the application as of the application filing date. The specimen shows the mark as used on or in connection with the goods or services and the facts set forth in the application are true.
The undersigned, being hereby warned that willful false statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. 1001, and that such willful false statements may jeopardize the validity of the application or any resulting registration, declares that he/she is properly authorized to execute this application on behalf of the applicant; he/she believes the applicant to be the owner of the trademark/service mark sought to be registered, or, if the application is being filed under 15 U.S.C. 1051(b), 1126(d) or 1126(e), he/she believes applicant to be entitled to use such mark in commerce; to the best of his/her knowledge and belief no other person, firm, corporation, or association has the right to use the mark in commerce, either in the identical form thereof or in such near resemblance thereto as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods/services of such other person, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive; and that all statements made of his/her own knowledge are true and all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true.
_____________________________
(Signature)
_____________________________
(Print or Type Name and Position)
_____________________________
(Date)
Drawing Unacceptable-Substitute Required
The drawing is not acceptable because it will not reproduce satisfactorily due to the use of gray shading and lack of visual clarity for purposes of reproduction. The applicant must submit a new drawing showing the mark clearly and conforming to 37 C.F.R. §2.52. TMEP §807.07(a).
The requirements for a special‑form drawing are as follows:
(1) The drawing must appear in black and white; no color is permitted.
(2) Every line and letter must be black and clear.
(3) The use of gray to indicate shading is unacceptable.
(4) The lining must not be too fine or too close together.
(5) The preferred size of the area in which the mark is displayed is 2½ inches (6.1 cm.) high and 2½ inches (6.1 cm.) wide. It should not be larger than 4 inches (10.3 cm.) high or 4 inches (10.3 cm.) wide.
(6) If the reduction of the mark to the required size renders any details illegible, the applicant may insert a statement in the application to describe the mark and these details.
37 C.F.R. §2.52; TMEP §§807.01(b) and 807.07(a). The Office will enforce these drawing requirements strictly.
The Office prefers that the drawing be depicted on a separate sheet of smooth, nonshiny, white paper 8 to 8½ inches (20.3 to 21.6 cm.) wide and 11 inches (27.9 cm.) long, and that the sheet contain a heading listing, on separate lines, the applicant’s complete name; the applicant’s address; the goods or services recited in the application; and, if the application is filed under Section 1(a) of the Act, the dates of first use of the mark and of first use of the mark in commerce; or, if the application is filed under Section 44(d), the priority filing date of the foreign application. 37 C.F.R. §2.52(b); TMEP §§807.01(a), 807.01(b), 807.01(c) and 807.07(a).
If the applicant has any questions or needs assistance in responding to this Office action, please telephone, e-mail or fax the assigned examining attorney.
/DominicJFerraiuolo/
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 102
e-mail: ecom102@uspto.gov
(703) 308-9102 ext. 174
fax: (703) 746-8102
How to respond to this Office Action:
To respond formally using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html and follow the instructions.
To respond formally via E-mail, visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/web/trademarks/tmelecresp.htm and follow the instructions.
To respond formally via regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing Return Address listed above and include the serial number, law office and examining attorney’s name on the upper right corner of each page of your response.
FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY.